Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective

Vreese, Claes H. de; Esser, Frank; Aalberg, Toril; Reinemann, Carsten; Stanyer, James

doi:10.1177/1940161218790035

Cited by 368 publications

(258 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

228

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hva er det ved kultureliten som gjør den så forhatt? Hva er det som gjør at kultureliten pekes ut som viktig grunn til høyrepopulismens fremgang (Brubaker, 2017;Frank, 2006;Marsdal, 2007;Rydgren, 2013;de Vreese, Esser, Aalberg, Reinemann & Stanyer, 2018)?…”

unclassified

Eliten vi elsker å hate. Mediekonstruerte myterom svensk og norsk kulturelite

Krogstad¹

2019

TfS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hvilke trekk er det ved kultureliten som gjør at vi elsker å hate den, hvordan vurderes den politisk, og hvilke motsetninger og interne spenninger rommer forestillingene om den? Spørsmålene besvares gjennom bruk av en kombinert kvantitativ og kvalitativ ramme-og kulturanalyse av svenske og norske riksaviser (2008-2015). Den typiske representanten beskrives som en smakselitistisk, politisk korrekt, mektig, arrogant og privilegert figur. Av de fem rammene som fremanalyseres, er det kulturelitens smak og politiske betydning som dominerer i begge land. Til tross for noe ambivalens, er begge lands kultureliter beskrevet overveiende negativt. Kulturelitens angivelige forakt og arroganse provoserer aller mest. De mediekonstruerte mytene om kultureliten konstrueres likevel noe ulikt. Den svenske kultureliten beskrives som mer politisk betent og kontroversiell-både med hensyn til spenninger mellom kulturelite og folk og mellom kulturelitens kvinner og menn. Samtidig viser sammenlikninger med tidligere undersøkelser at en vag politisk skepsis til den norske kultureliten er erstattet av mer aggressive holdninger. Artikkelens teoretiske bidrag er koblingen av rammeanalyse, kulturell resonans og myter, et rammeverk som i større grad enn konvensjonell rammeanalyse gir mulighet til å analysere interne motsetninger og formmessige driv i kollektive oppfatninger.

show abstract

unclassified

Eliten vi elsker å hate. Mediekonstruerte myterom svensk og norsk kulturelite

Krogstad¹

2019

TfS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In sum, there are no simple and across-the-board conclusions about the workings of populist communication across Europe. This is an important antidote to the pervasive naïve, universalist narrative about populism (see also de Vreese, Esser, Aalberg, Reinemann, & Stanyer, 2018 ). Although economic issues and the societal and political discussion about immigration and integration can generally be regarded as conducive to populist success, the dynamics and patterns of populist communication and how it is covered and perceived still seem to be strongly aff ected by national contexts.…”

Section: General Conclusion From the Empirical Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…But they should not be looked at in isolation, but rather as part of a larger information system, in which social media and their users interact with traditional news media and political actors in ever faster news cycles. At the same time, we still know too little about key features of social media communication in the context of populism when it comes to, for example, visuals, patterns of sharing and liking, the relevance of bots and trolls, or the extent of personalization and disinformation ( de Vreese et al, 2018 ).…”

Section: Acknowledge the Emotional Citizen And Citizens' Emotionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adapting to the Different Shades of Populism

Vreese¹,

Reinemann²,

Stanyer³

et al. 2019

Communicating Populism

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The right of Carsten Reinemann, James Stanyer, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, and Claes H. de Vreese to be identifi ed as the authors of the editorial material, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. With the exception of Chapters 1 and 12, no part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Chapters 1 and 12 of this book is available for free in PDF format as Open Access from the individual product page at www.routledge.com. It has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

show abstract

“…The burgeoning literature on the effects of populist communication spans effects on attitudes, emotions, support for leaders, and voting intentions (Hameleers et al and Andreadis et al, in this volume;de Vreese, Esser, Aalberg, Reinemann, & Stanyer, 2018). It has been demonstrated in communication effects studies, using different designs and examining different country cases, that populist cues can be effective in changing people's political opinions and behavior (see Hameleers et al in this volume for an overview of the psychological mechanisms behind these effects).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%