2016
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00095914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Por que reconsiderar a indicação do rastreamento do câncer de mama?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
17

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This has enormous implications for public health as recently synthesized by Bulliard & Chiolero 34 . Contrary to the beliefs induced by the natural history model of diseases, there is strong evidence that overdiagnosis is more common than one would have thought, and this is particularly true in cancer screening 35 . Since 2013, international conferences on overdiagnosis and overtreatment are being held to tackle this phenomenon (http:// www.preventingoverdiagnosis.net/).…”
Section: Unsustainable and Dangerous Fusionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has enormous implications for public health as recently synthesized by Bulliard & Chiolero 34 . Contrary to the beliefs induced by the natural history model of diseases, there is strong evidence that overdiagnosis is more common than one would have thought, and this is particularly true in cancer screening 35 . Since 2013, international conferences on overdiagnosis and overtreatment are being held to tackle this phenomenon (http:// www.preventingoverdiagnosis.net/).…”
Section: Unsustainable and Dangerous Fusionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For example, in cancer screening, wherein the spectrum of harm is very significant in group D, they are commonly not measured in their entirety in clinical trials 41 . Additionally, when they are measured in large systematic reviews and metaanalyses, scientific articles usually do not include such reviews 35 . This is a common occurrence in specialist medical journals rather than in general practitioner journals.…”
Section: Technical and Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several additive preventive activities do not stand the test of the PP. We should mention some examples even without detail or discussion, due to space limitations: mammographic screening for breast cancer has an unfavorable 66 or, at least doubtful, harm-benefit ratio in the face of extensive and serious damage 12,[67][68][69] . The same occurs with the case of screening for prostate cancer 70 .…”
Section: The Precautionary Principle Articulated To Additive Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overdiagnosis and overtreatment occur in large proportions in disease screening 11,12 , generating the paradox of popularity 13 : Overdiagnosed and overtreated people believe that they were saved by screening even though they were actually harmed. This context is interpreted as beneficial, i.e., the adverse effects are supposedly offset by the "cure" of the chimerical disease/risk factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%