SummaryRecently, three independent laboratories reported the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from pig (Sus scrofa). This finding sums to the growing list of species (mouse, human, monkey, and rat, in this order) for which successful reprogramming using exogenous factors has been achieved, and multiple others are possibly forthcoming. But apart from demonstrating the universality of the network identified by Shinya Yamanaka, what makes the porcine model so special? On one side, pigs are an agricultural commodity and have an easy and affordable maintenance compared with nonhuman primates that normally need to be imported. On the other side, resemblance (for example, size of organs) of porcine and human physiology is striking and because pigs are a regular source of food the ethical concerns that still remain in monkeys are not applicable. Besides, the prolonged lifespan of pigs compared with other domestic species can allow exhaustive follow up of side effects after transplantation. Porcine iPSCs may thus fill the gap between the mouse model, which due to its ease is preferred for mechanistic studies, and the first clinical trials using iPSCs in humans. However, although these studies are relevant and have created significant interest they face analogous problems that we discuss herein together with potential new directions.
THE DISCOVERY OF INDUCED PLURIPOTENCYThe isolation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) in 1981 and 1998, respectively, has supposed a tremendous scientific advance (1, 2). The longstanding promise of ESCs has been to replace diseased cells and organs usingunless differentiation is triggered-an unlimited source of selfrenewing cells which have the ability to produce all tissues that compose an adult individual (pluripotency). In addition, ESCs have provided a new and powerful model for studying cell fate determination, epigenetic regulation, and disease. Remarkably, mouse ESCs also initiated mammalian genetic manipulation by means of homologous recombination. However, at least in humans, ESCs have ignited a debate that seriously hampered both clinical application and research (3, 4). To avoid controversy, scientists have pursued the generation of ESC-like cells from terminally differentiated (somatic) cells using varied methods [fusion with ESCs, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), and iPS] that hereafter are generically referred to as nuclear reprogramming or reprogramming (5, 6).Several decades ago, pioneer experiments by Briggs, King, and Gurdon demonstrated that transfer of the nucleus from a frog somatic cell into an enucleated egg can allow the development of this egg to a heartbeat-stage tadpole (7). These experiments set the arena for intensive research that culminated in 1997 with the birth of Dolly the sheep using SCNT (5). Theoretically, SCNT-derived human blastocysts could also be used to produce patient-specific ESC-like cells less constrained by ethical concerns, but the technique is more challenging in humans than in other species and the scarci...