2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore characterization of organic-rich Lower Cambrian shales in Qiannan Depression of Guizhou Province, Southwestern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
98
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These agree well with previous results from gas shales in North American basins (Chalmers and Bustin, 2008;Ross and Bustin, 2009) and Lower Silurian and Lower Cambrian shales in southwestern China (Tian et al, 2013. They both suggest that organic matters provide important spaces for micropores development in the Lower Silurian shale, which has also been reported in other shales (Milliken et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2013Tian et al, , 2015. In addition to organic matter abundance, organic matter maturity also plays an important role for micropore development, which has been reported in other shale (Chen and Xiao, 2014).…”
Section: Isotherms Of Co 2 Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These agree well with previous results from gas shales in North American basins (Chalmers and Bustin, 2008;Ross and Bustin, 2009) and Lower Silurian and Lower Cambrian shales in southwestern China (Tian et al, 2013. They both suggest that organic matters provide important spaces for micropores development in the Lower Silurian shale, which has also been reported in other shales (Milliken et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2013Tian et al, , 2015. In addition to organic matter abundance, organic matter maturity also plays an important role for micropore development, which has been reported in other shale (Chen and Xiao, 2014).…”
Section: Isotherms Of Co 2 Adsorptionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The permeability of the studied shales rank as LSL shale (average of 0.0016 mD) > UOW shale (average of 0.0014 mD) > LCN shale (average of 0.0012 mD) ( Table 1). The distinction of the porosity and permeability between different shales in this study is consistent with these previous studies [11,13,17], which indirectly confirms the veracity of the comparison regarding the porosity and permeability of different shales.…”
Section: Porosity and Permeabilitysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As higher total pore volume is more advantageous for shale gas extraction [17,28], the results of the PSD analysis show that the LSL and the UOW shales are more competitive than the LCN shale. Figure 6.…”
Section: Pore Size Distribution (Psd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Multiple techniques have been used to characterize the pore structure mainly including direct imaging and indirect fluid penetration methods. 4,18 Direct imaging methods, including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), can directly obtain high-resolution images of the pore structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%