1995
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1995.1154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Size Distribution (PSD) Measurements of Silica Gels by Means of Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
142
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
142
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The density and the value of DH (enthalpy change of fusion) of frozen pore water, both of which depend on temperature, can be calculated from the dependences [10,12]:…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density and the value of DH (enthalpy change of fusion) of frozen pore water, both of which depend on temperature, can be calculated from the dependences [10,12]:…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of interactions is studied, among others, by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) providing essential information about porous structure of the studied materials [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The method consists in studying phase solid/liquid transitions of the media contained in pores [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We decided to use both NLDFT and BJH method because even NLDFT is recommended for cylindrical pore analysis, the results of pore diameter value Table 2 Amount of non-freezing water per gram of silica D1, D2 and D6 at different moisture contents (t), expressed as thickness of nonfreezing liquid layer (t*) and as the amount of monolayers (w) The thickness of non-freezing liquid layer t* was calculated based on the values of the surface area obtained from NLDFT method. The amount of monolayers present in the silica channels was obtained under assumption that the van der Waals radius of water is equal to 0.3 nm [41] (b) (Table 1). It is well seen in the case of D7 for which pore diameter derived from NLDFT is higher than that obtained from XRD patterns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of thermoporosimetry has come into some use as a means of characterizing heterogeneous systems and crosslinked polymer heterogeneity. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] In this method, thermal analysis is used to obtain melting point distributions and, through the Gibbs-Thomson (GT) equation, 14 relate crystal size and size distribution to the shape of the melting thermograms. In the case of crosslinked rubber, the melting point depression has an additional thermodynamic contribution different from size that is related to the polymersolvent interactions and should be described by the Flory-Huggins (FH) expression 15,16 for melting of the diluent in a polymer solution.…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%