“…Apart from nanoparticle size, morphology, and shape, pore structures have also been determined as a factor to influence adsorbed protein numbers and composition on MSNs, resulting in higher proportions of low molecular weight (MW) proteins. 22 Additionally, using a set of porous nanoparticles bearing the same well-defined shape and size but differing in pore diameter, Vidaurre-Agut et al demonstrated a distinct effect of pore diameter on competitive serum protein adsorption using a representative low MW protein (apolipoprotein A-II) and a high MW protein (complement C3). 23 More specifically, the extent of protein adsorption was comparatively evaluated on dense nonporous silica nanoparticles ("SNPs") with a diameter of ∼120 nm, standard MSNs with a hexagonally ordered pore structure and a pore diameter of 2.7 nm, and large-pore silica ("LPS") nanoparticles with increasing pore diameters of 4.8, 6.2, 7.4, and 14 nm.…”