2016
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pork fat quality of pigs fed distillers dried grains with solubles with variable oil content and evaluation of iodine value prediction equations1

Abstract: Back, belly, and jowl fat samples of pigs fed control corn-soybean meal-based diets and diets containing 4 sources of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) were used to determine the impact of feeding DDGS with variable oil content on pork fat quality and to evaluate the precision and accuracy of published iodine value (IV) prediction equations. Dietary treatments consisted of 4 corn-soybean meal diets containing 40% DDGS from different sources with 10.7, 5.6, 14.2, or 16.0% ether extract (EE; as-fed) c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HP-DDG source used in the current study contained 36% NDF, resulting in the HP-DDG diets having 70–80% more NDF than CON diets. This response is consistent with several other studies where feeding 30% DDGS diets, in which DDGS had similar NDF content compared with HP-DDG, reduced carcass yield ( Whitney et al, 2006 ; Xu et al, 2010 ; Wu et al, 2016a ). Backfat depth was not different between pigs fed HP-DDG and CON, which is in agreement with other studies that evaluated the addition of earlier HP-DDG sources to growing–finishing pig diets ( Widmer et al, 2008 ; Kim et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HP-DDG source used in the current study contained 36% NDF, resulting in the HP-DDG diets having 70–80% more NDF than CON diets. This response is consistent with several other studies where feeding 30% DDGS diets, in which DDGS had similar NDF content compared with HP-DDG, reduced carcass yield ( Whitney et al, 2006 ; Xu et al, 2010 ; Wu et al, 2016a ). Backfat depth was not different between pigs fed HP-DDG and CON, which is in agreement with other studies that evaluated the addition of earlier HP-DDG sources to growing–finishing pig diets ( Widmer et al, 2008 ; Kim et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The source of HP-DDG used in this experiment contained about 10% EE, which is similar to some conventional DDGS sources and much greater than reported for previously produced HP-DDG sources (3.5%) in NRC (2012) . Feeding diets containing increasing inclusion rates of DDGS increases the unsaturated fatty acid content of pork carcass fat depots and reduces pork fat firmness ( Xu et al, 2010 ; Wu et al, 2016b ). Corn oil present in DDGS and HP-DDG contains a high (58%) concentration of linoleic acid (C18:2; NRC, 2012 ), which is the primary contributor to undesirable soft pork fat ( Wood et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of fatty acids and their relative proportions are important in feeding programs because they supply essential fatty acids such as linoleic and linolenic acid ( NRC, 2012 ). However, feeding high amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids have been shown to reduce pork fat firmness ( Wu et al, 2016 ; Villela et al, 2017 ). Thus, it is important to determine the fatty acid composition of lipids in various feed ingredients when formulating growing-finishing pig diets to achieve acceptable pork fat quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the 2 trials consisted of a 48-d feces and urine collection into 1 tank per pig, with 12 individually penned gilts per treatment. Diets with DDGS contained 30.34% DDGS while the narasin diets contained 30 mg narasin/kg diet.. Gutierrez et al, 2013Gutierrez et al, , 2014aGutierrez et al, , 2014bKerr et al, 2013Kerr et al, , 2015aKerr et al, , 2015bKerr et al, , 2017Wu et al, 2016aWu et al, , 2016bWu et al, , 2016c and was not an objective of the current experiment. That said, a change in energy or nutrient digestibility (represented by a change in fiber digestibility in this experiment), can have (Kerr et al, 2006;Ziemer et al, 2009;Trabue and Kerr, 2014;Trabue et al, 2016b;Van Weelden et al, 2016a, and data obtained from this experiment are no exception.…”
Section: Manure Characteristics and Total Manure Nutrient Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%