2015
DOI: 10.5194/se-6-1207-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poroelastic responses of confined aquifers to subsurface strain and their use for volcano monitoring

Abstract: Abstract. Well water level changes associated with magmatic unrest can be interpreted as a result of pore pressure changes in the aquifer due to crustal deformation, and so could provide constraints on the subsurface processes causing this strain. We use finite element analysis to demonstrate the response of aquifers to volumetric strain induced by pressurized magma reservoirs. Two different aquifers are invoked -an unconsolidated pyroclastic deposit and a vesicular lava flow -and embedded in an impermeable cr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large simulated water level changes are consistent with observations of large water level fluctuations (<100 m) in wells, increased flow at hot springs, and large influxes of thermal water into drainages as a result of inferred magma intrusion (either within the edifice itself or at greater depth; Matsumoto et al, ; Newhall et al, ; Shibata & Akita, ). Mechanical processes (strain) tend to be invoked to explain changes in water levels (Hurwitz & Johnston, ; Newhall et al, ; Shibata & Akita, ; Strehlow et al, ). Our simulation results are also consistent with previous results that show that edifice permeability structure exerts a significant control on response to hydrothermal perturbations, although the amplitude of water‐table elevation changes in our simulations is smaller than those previously obtained (Hemmings et al ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large simulated water level changes are consistent with observations of large water level fluctuations (<100 m) in wells, increased flow at hot springs, and large influxes of thermal water into drainages as a result of inferred magma intrusion (either within the edifice itself or at greater depth; Matsumoto et al, ; Newhall et al, ; Shibata & Akita, ). Mechanical processes (strain) tend to be invoked to explain changes in water levels (Hurwitz & Johnston, ; Newhall et al, ; Shibata & Akita, ; Strehlow et al, ). Our simulation results are also consistent with previous results that show that edifice permeability structure exerts a significant control on response to hydrothermal perturbations, although the amplitude of water‐table elevation changes in our simulations is smaller than those previously obtained (Hemmings et al ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also simulate the swelling of an heterogeneous porous medium, where we consider that the permeability is zero in the strip 0.45 ≤ x 1 ≤ 0.55 and otherwise we take κ = 1 (that is, five orders of magnitude larger than in the previous test). Zones of zero permeability are commonly encountered in simulation of heterogeneous porous skeletons and layered media [31]. Notice that in classical formulations, the inverse of κ appears in the momentum equation, and thus the problem may degenerate (see [34]).…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local stress fields can be altered by the intrusion of magma [ Troise , ; Amelung et al , ; Currenti et al , ; Jónsson , ], in turn clamping or unclamping nearby faults [ Roman and Heron , ]. This, in turn, alters the permeability of faults, promoting or inhibiting fluid migration into them [ Hautmann et al , ; Strehlow et al , ]. Distinguishing between magmatic and hydrothermal causes of volcanic unrest, and understanding the role tectonics plays in modulating them, is important for understanding the potential hazard the unrest represents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint inversion of those data yields the absolute density of the source fluid, allowing magmatic versus hydrothermal processes to be distinguished. However, in some cases, gravity and deformation signals are not produced from the same source [e.g., Johnson et al, 2010] and shallow fluid injection may be related to permeability changes induced by deeper magma intrusion [Strehlow et al, 2015]. Interpreting the two as resulting from a single source may mask other processes at work, resulting in an incomplete understanding of the system dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%