2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity distribution affecting mechanical and biological behaviour of hydroxyapatite bioceramic composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, there is few data in the literature concerning fracture energies of porous ceramics. Kanhed et al [57] found fracture toughness values in the range of 0.55-0.86 MPa m 1=2 for porous hydroxyapatite.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Porous Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, there is few data in the literature concerning fracture energies of porous ceramics. Kanhed et al [57] found fracture toughness values in the range of 0.55-0.86 MPa m 1=2 for porous hydroxyapatite.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Porous Ceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 shows that the addition of 10 mass% forsterite led to a reduction in the particle size. Such a reduction in the particle size caused a reduction in the crack free path, which in turn improved the strength [2,25]. An increase in the forsterite content to 30 mass% led to a decrease in the mechanical properties.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These limitations have provoked greater research efforts in bone tissue engineering with an aim to utilise a synergistic combination of different materials for functional bone regeneration [ 3 ]. In a typical bone tissue engineering protocol, a three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffold is initially made and is then loaded with specific living cells and/or tissue-inducing growth factors to initiate and promote tissue regeneration or replacement [ 2 , 4 ]. The initiative of bone tissue engineering has escalated research in the field of biomedical sciences, i.e., it has resulted in a more biologically focused and coherent way of designing and developing 3D scaffolds with an appropriate/desired porosity so that they can serve as reinforcement, support, and in some special cases, firmly establish tissue regeneration and replacement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, various biomaterials are designed and fabricated using polymers, metals, ceramics, or their composites. Bioceramics and their composites have increasingly become an established class of materials applied as human body implants in the form of 3D scaffolds, as they have the necessary properties for biological activity in regard to cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation [ 2 , 4 , 7 ]. Amongst the different types of bioceramics available, those having a similar chemical identity to that of bone (i.e., calcium phosphate-based ceramics, like hydroxyapatite) have been found to be the most successful, however, their inherently low fracture toughness and strength have historically hampered their use in load-bearing applications [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%