“…Other studies can also be found in the literature, such as the experimental and numerical study of the cross ventilation of a building equipped with louvers in four cases of open position in four cases of opening position (openings in the center of the windward and the leeward, at the top, at the bottom and an opening at the top of windward and the other at the bottom of the leeward) [20], a 3D simulations were performed in steady state using Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes, with RNG k-ε, k-ω SST and RSM turbulence models, the numerical results have been validated with experimental data and the best agreement was given by the RSM model for the studied case [20], The highest dimensionless air flow rate is obtained in the first case (opening with louvers at the top of the walls) and 45% of air renewal rate is obtained for the first case (openings with louvers in the center of the windward and the leeward) [20]. In the same context, a quantification of the velocity and pressure deviation was investigated numerically by Chinchun et al [21] by numerical simulation of natural ventilation and effect of the porosity of the openings analysis (number of louvers N=7, N=15 and their incidence angle of 30, 45 and 60°) on dynamic parameters of the cross-ventilation, particularly the horizontal velocity component and the jets angles. Otherwise, Arinami et al [22], studied the impact of the guide vanes (GVs), installed in the center of the openings, and the adjacent obstacles (installed at the openings lateral extremity) on the ventilation efficiency and air change rate in a building model, it was confirmed that the dynamic parameters of ventilation were considerably influenced by the presence of obstacles and guide vanes [22].…”