2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous SnO2 nanoflakes with loose-packed structure: Morphology conserved transformation from SnS2 precursor and application in lithium ion batteries and gas sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures a and S3, the SnO 2 nanosheet consists of nanoparticle-shaped SnO 2 , and the 1T-MoS 2 was tightly coated on the surface of SnO 2 nanoparticles. The crystal structure of SnO 2 /TMS could be clearly verified in the high-resolution TEM picture of Figure b. The energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis is shown in Figure c-g, and the results imply that the S, O, Mo, and Sn were dispersed uniformly in the SnO 2 /TMS sample, in agreement with the EDS mapping result (Figure S5). In addition, the N 2 isothermal adsorption and desorption measurement was carried out to investigate the specific surface area of SnO 2 /TMS.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…As shown in Figures a and S3, the SnO 2 nanosheet consists of nanoparticle-shaped SnO 2 , and the 1T-MoS 2 was tightly coated on the surface of SnO 2 nanoparticles. The crystal structure of SnO 2 /TMS could be clearly verified in the high-resolution TEM picture of Figure b. The energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis is shown in Figure c-g, and the results imply that the S, O, Mo, and Sn were dispersed uniformly in the SnO 2 /TMS sample, in agreement with the EDS mapping result (Figure S5). In addition, the N 2 isothermal adsorption and desorption measurement was carried out to investigate the specific surface area of SnO 2 /TMS.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The average pore diameter of the SnO 2 nanosheets is about 4–5 nm (as measured by application of the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda method) to the desorption data (Figure b), in excellent agreement with the TEM image in Figure a. The formation of the mesoporous structure could be due to the replacement of S 2− by smaller sized O 2− during calcination . Importantly, all active sites are readily accessible to the reactant on a short timescale owing to the high mesoporosity and ultrathin thickness (less than 10 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The formation of the mesoporous structure could be due to the replacement of S 2À by smaller sized O 2À during calcination. [17] Importantly, all active sites are readily accessible to the reactant on a short timescale owing to the high mesoporosity and ultrathin thickness (less than 10 nm). Consequently, much enhanced electrocatalytic performance can be expected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%