2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11041714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portable Spectroscopy Calibration with Inexpensive and Simple Sampling Reference Alternatives for Dry Matter and Total Carotenoid Contents in Cassava Roots

Abstract: The use of standard laboratory methods for trait evaluation is expensive and challenging, especially for low-resource breeding programs. For carotenoid assessment, rather than the standard HPLC method, these programs mostly rely on proxy approaches for quantitative total carotenoid content (TCC) assessment. To ensure data transferability and consistency, calibration models were developed using TCC iCheck and Chroma Meter proxy methods for the adoption of the alternative near-infrared phenotyping method in cass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed variation in algorithm performance between studies could be attributed to differences in the trait investigated, data distribution, and sample variability ( Frizzarin et al., 2021 ). Consistent with previous studies, SVM and PLSR outperformed the RF algorithm in this study ( Mendez et al., 2019 ; Abincha et al., 2021 ; Hershberger et al., 2022 ). PLSR may remain the go-to model for trait prediction with NIRS due to its sensitivity and computational efficiency.…”
Section: Assessment Of Model Predictionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed variation in algorithm performance between studies could be attributed to differences in the trait investigated, data distribution, and sample variability ( Frizzarin et al., 2021 ). Consistent with previous studies, SVM and PLSR outperformed the RF algorithm in this study ( Mendez et al., 2019 ; Abincha et al., 2021 ; Hershberger et al., 2022 ). PLSR may remain the go-to model for trait prediction with NIRS due to its sensitivity and computational efficiency.…”
Section: Assessment Of Model Predictionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recent studies have reported the value of NIRS for predicting key cassava traits such as dry matter, carotenoids, cyanogenic glucosides, and starch content in fresh cassava roots ( Sánchez et al., 2014 ; Ikeogu et al., 2019 ; Bantadjan et al., 2020a ; Bantadjan et al., 2020b ; Abincha et al., 2021 ; Hershberger et al., 2022 ). NIR sensors, particularly miniaturized devices, will be helpful in cassava breeding programs where thousands of samples are processed, and data turnaround is critical.…”
Section: The Routine Use Of Near-infrared Spectroscopy For Trait Pred...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nearinfrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) is the most widespread reflectance spectroscopy currently in use. NIRS was successfully deployed for assessment in maize [65], cassava [66], and sweet potato [67]. While the non-destructive assessment of carotenoids is still a relatively new approach, it has not been introduced in cowpea, suggesting there is an avenue for technology development in cowpea research.…”
Section: Non-destructive Analysis Of Carotenoid Content In Cowpeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the quick estimate of important cassava traits, near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has shown promise (Ikegu et al,2017;Rittiron et al,2020;Abincha et al, 2021;Hershberger et al, 2022;Nkouaya Mbanjo et al, 2022). In addition, pasting properties of rice were predicted with su cient accuracy by NIRS based on our spectra (Bao et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%