2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portal Vein Arterialization Increases Hepatocellular Apoptosis and Inhibits Liver Regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the ALT level increased significantly in both groups in the early postoperative stage, and then declined to the normal level on postoperative day 7. The changes in the ALT level were consistent with those previously described (3,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the present study, the ALT level increased significantly in both groups in the early postoperative stage, and then declined to the normal level on postoperative day 7. The changes in the ALT level were consistent with those previously described (3,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, graft survival in their study was low (<50% by 30 postoperative days) and they also ligated the native bile duct; consequently the native liver shrank, similarly to the procedure of Hess et al with a survival rate of only 44.4% 17 . Others have reported portal arterialization 19 producing a survival rate at 14 days of 77.7%; however, in these studies, hepatocytes did not survive long-term with arterial blood flow alone 32,33 . Marni et al 20 also achieved a high survival rate of 80% at 2 weeks and 73.3% at 8 weeks by using a cuff technique for PV and IVC anastomosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The radiological intervention is less invasive than surgical intervention and effective with fewer complications 1) ; however, as Roux et al noted 14) , potential complications such as ischemic change to the liver parenchyma, development of abscess, and coil migration warrant consideration of the risks of endovascular treatment. After treatment, the clinical prognosis of APFs is favorable 1,2,4) ; however, the long-term effect of the APFs may have negative impacts on the regeneration of hepatic parenchyma or the parenchymal structures 15,16) . Thus, we suggest that asymptomatic APFs or remnant fistulas after embolization of large/multiple APFs should be monitored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%