2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2019.101425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio value-at-risk with two-sided Weibull distribution: Evidence from cryptocurrency markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the study are supported by You (2019), for confirmation of statistical properties of Bitcoin exchange rates. Silahli et al, (2021) confirm the findings of the study regarding the application of Weibull distribution as an outperformer to other models. Other studies that augment the findings of this research and confirm the status of Weibull Distribution as the best fit include Imtiaz et al, (2021), Kohli et al, (2021), andShanaev et al, (2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The findings of the study are supported by You (2019), for confirmation of statistical properties of Bitcoin exchange rates. Silahli et al, (2021) confirm the findings of the study regarding the application of Weibull distribution as an outperformer to other models. Other studies that augment the findings of this research and confirm the status of Weibull Distribution as the best fit include Imtiaz et al, (2021), Kohli et al, (2021), andShanaev et al, (2021).…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Acereda et al (2020) find that more complex model specifications do not outperform the simpler ones for bitcoin VaR, as long as heavy-tailed distributions are used instead of the standard normal. Silahli et al (2021) also find that simple benchmark models succeed in various VaR backtests for several crypto assets.…”
Section: Englementioning
confidence: 74%
“…For instance Chu et al (2017) and Köchling et al (2020) find that IGARCH provides the optimal in-sample fit for bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies; and Bouoiyour and Selmi (2016) and Baur et al (2018) both find that bitcoin's variance process is integrated. The forecasting performance of EWMA volatility models is assessed by Catania et al (2019), Bazán-Palomino (2020), Nekhili and Sultan (2020) and Silahli et al (2021). Silahli et al (2021) also examine an even simpler equally-weighted moving average (EQMA) model as a benchmark, while Guesmi et al (2019) and Segnon and Bekiros (2020) use fractionally integrated models such as the FIGARCH and FIAPARCH.…”
Section: Survey Of Models Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, it is commonly used to assess product reliability and perform different kinds of reliability analysis [2] and modeling [3]. The Weibull distribution can fit a wide range of data from many different fields, including biology, medicine, economics, environmental science, and other kinds of science [4][5][6]. However, one of the most important application areas is engineering, where it is commonly used for the fatigue life prediction of different types of products, components, or elements [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%