2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position‐heading quadrotor control using LPV techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last decades, linear parameter varying (LPV) techniques have received a great deal of attention due to their practical applications in a wide range of areas, such as air–fuel ratio in vehicle engines [1], water tank system [2], quadrotor [3], vehicle motion [4, 5], and process system [6]. In most of the works published in the literature, it is supposed that scheduling parameters are exactly known in real‐time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decades, linear parameter varying (LPV) techniques have received a great deal of attention due to their practical applications in a wide range of areas, such as air–fuel ratio in vehicle engines [1], water tank system [2], quadrotor [3], vehicle motion [4, 5], and process system [6]. In most of the works published in the literature, it is supposed that scheduling parameters are exactly known in real‐time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [36], the quadrotor model is not only divided into fully actuated and underactuated subsystems, but also included the propeller subsystem to tackle the actuator faults. In [37], a linear parameter varying controller and feedback linearization controller were designed for the attitude and the position of a quadrotor respectively. In [38], an active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) and backstepping SMC have been constructed for the quadrotor attitude and the position respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed control strategy is divided into into three subcontrollers: ADIFTSMC for altitude control, RBFNNBC for horizontal position control, and FDOBNFTSMC for rotational angle control. The main contributions of the proposed method are presented as follows 1) Contrary to [37]- [43], [45] where the quadrotor control design is divided into two subcontrollers, we divided the proposed control scheme into three subcontrollers: the altitude, the horizontal position and the attitude controllers. 2) Unlike the adaptive NFTSMC [33], ADRC [38], backstepping FTSMC [40], RISE [44], backstepping SMC [45] implemented for the attitude control, in this paper, a backstepping is combined with NFTSMC and FDO (FDONFTSMC) to control the attitude angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atualmente, apenas alguns trabalhos discutem a formulação LMI do controlador LQR com ganho escalonado, os quais se dividem na escolha da classe da função de Lyapunov no cálculo da matriz de realimentação de estados, i.e. : (a) função de Lyapu-nov quadrática comum (do inglês, Common Quadratic Lyapunov Function -CQLF) (Alcala et al (2017(Alcala et al ( , 2018(Alcala et al ( , 2019; Trapiello et al (2019)) e (b) função de Lyapunov dependente de parâmetros (Parameter-Dependent Lyapunov Function -PDLF) (Aktas et al (2016); Liu et al (2017)). É importante ressaltar que na proposição (b) o ganho de realimentação de estados depende da inversão da matriz de Lyapunov queé literal.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified