2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position synchronization for track geometry inspection data via big-data fusion and incremental learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite HSTGC representing the cutting-edge technology in rail infrastructural condition inspection, a chance of measurement error due to various factors cannot be completely eliminated. Among these errors, milepost positional error [43,48] is a critical one, especially when there is a need to locate the track segment corresponding to anomalies on the waveform of track geometry data. In practice, the mileage information is obtained from the rotation angles and the wheel radius.…”
Section: Data Pre-processing: Eliminating Milepost Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite HSTGC representing the cutting-edge technology in rail infrastructural condition inspection, a chance of measurement error due to various factors cannot be completely eliminated. Among these errors, milepost positional error [43,48] is a critical one, especially when there is a need to locate the track segment corresponding to anomalies on the waveform of track geometry data. In practice, the mileage information is obtained from the rotation angles and the wheel radius.…”
Section: Data Pre-processing: Eliminating Milepost Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the mileage information is obtained from the rotation angles and the wheel radius. However, positional errors can inevitably occur and accumulate due to radial errors of the wheels, faulty encoder output, degraded adhesive conditions, and track geometry irregularities [48]. Field investigations have found that the milepost position could be off up to 200 m [43], which is much longer than the length of track slab.…”
Section: Data Pre-processing: Eliminating Milepost Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, track geometry measurement data obtained by inspection cars suffer from measurement errors and positional errors. The positional error can be as much as 100 m in some cases (Wang, Wang, Wang, & Liu, 2018). Positional errors negatively affect the accuracy of the track irregularity predictions achieved by track geometry degradation models.…”
Section: Data Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPB methods are used to align measurement data collected in different inspections (Xu, Sun, Liu, & Souleyrette, 2016). For more studies regarding the ABP methods and RBP methods, readers are referred to the work by Wang et al (2018) and Xu et al (2016).…”
Section: Data Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For collecting track conditions, the railway industry has employed various dedicated devices, such as track inspection vehicles [31] and visual inspection systems [32]. Although these devices perform well in detecting track conditions, the expensive cost and the interference for regular operation limit their usage in urban rail transit systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%