2021
DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2021.1905920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positioning place-making as a social process: A systematic literature review

Abstract: This systematic review discusses the shifted paradigm in the place-making concept, from being focused on physical changes in the environment (product-oriented) created by urban planners, towards place-making as an iterative process that involves various actors other than the planning professionals. Despite this conceptual reorientation that was emerged in the 1960s, important discussions, such as factors that support or obstruct the process of place-making are often mentioned incidentally in publications witho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…"Space" pertains to the functional aspect of the "physical space", whereas "place" constructs a notion of "space" in a relational sense, signifying the location of social practices involving various stakeholders [106]. The collaborative nature of placemaking, akin to co-creation, involves various stakeholders such as local authorities, design and planning professionals, engineering and construction experts, craftsmen, facility management providers, and local communities along with their members [107]. It extends beyond conventional focus on physical place-making, emphasizing the importance of social processes in shaping these spaces.…”
Section: Co-design-prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Space" pertains to the functional aspect of the "physical space", whereas "place" constructs a notion of "space" in a relational sense, signifying the location of social practices involving various stakeholders [106]. The collaborative nature of placemaking, akin to co-creation, involves various stakeholders such as local authorities, design and planning professionals, engineering and construction experts, craftsmen, facility management providers, and local communities along with their members [107]. It extends beyond conventional focus on physical place-making, emphasizing the importance of social processes in shaping these spaces.…”
Section: Co-design-prototypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa teori klasik perancangan yang menekankan karakter tempat antara lain citra kota oleh Lynch (1960), teori tempat oleh Trancik (1986), dan desain lingkungan yang responsif oleh Bentley, dkk (1985). Selain itu, pendekatan karakter sangat bertalian erat dengan konsep placemaking yang pada hakikatnya mengedepankan proses dalam mengintegrasikan pandangan dari berbagai pihak dan berbagai fungsi ke dalam proses transformasi ruang dengan mempertimbangkan proses sosial yang membentuk suatu tempat [16]. Dengan demikian, community engagement dan placemaking merupakan kegiatan atau proses yang bersifat integral.…”
Section: Metode Pengabdianunclassified
“…Demikian pula, perhatian konservasi yang sebelumnya menekankan pertimbangan terhadap lingkungan buatan manusia yang bernilai sejarah beralih menjadi apresiasi terhadap nilai-nilai lingkungan dan sosialekonomi dari cultural heritage. Lebih lanjut dijelaskan bahwa beberapa peneliti menekankan pada pola-pola sosial dan tradisi yang masih hidup, meskipun keduanya terhubung ataupun tidak terhubung dengan artefak fisik [3], [6].…”
Section: Konservasi Lanskap Ruang Kota Dan Identitas Tempatunclassified