2022
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.947630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Predictive Value of MOG-IgG for Clinically Defined MOG-AD Within a Real-World Cohort

Abstract: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease (MOG-AD) is a CNS demyelinating disease, typically presenting with optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and/or ADEM-like syndromes. The positive predictive value (PPV) of MOG-IgG testing by live cell-based assay was reported to be 72% in a study performed at the Mayo Clinic using a cut-off of 1:20. PPV may vary depending upon the tested population, thus supporting further investigation of MOG-IgG testing at other centers. In this real-world instit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnosis of the underlying etiology was performed as part of the clinical routine and documented at follow-up visit respecting diagnostic criteria for MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria 11 , NMOSD according to the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria and positive serum AQP4-IgG by cell-based assay 12 , and MOGAD at presentation in patients with clinical characteristics consistent with MOGAD-ON and positive serum MOG-IgG 13 . Serological testing for MOG-IgG was conducted at presentation in all optic neuritis patients presenting with findings suggestive of MOGAD, as proposed by Jarius et al in the international recommendations on diagnosis of MOGAD 14 . Testing for MOG-IgG in all MS patients is not warranted, as the positive predictive value for MOG-IgG is only 72%, and routine testing may lead to a significant increase in false positives 15 , 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diagnosis of the underlying etiology was performed as part of the clinical routine and documented at follow-up visit respecting diagnostic criteria for MS according to the 2017 McDonald criteria 11 , NMOSD according to the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria and positive serum AQP4-IgG by cell-based assay 12 , and MOGAD at presentation in patients with clinical characteristics consistent with MOGAD-ON and positive serum MOG-IgG 13 . Serological testing for MOG-IgG was conducted at presentation in all optic neuritis patients presenting with findings suggestive of MOGAD, as proposed by Jarius et al in the international recommendations on diagnosis of MOGAD 14 . Testing for MOG-IgG in all MS patients is not warranted, as the positive predictive value for MOG-IgG is only 72%, and routine testing may lead to a significant increase in false positives 15 , 16 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing for MOG-IgG in all MS patients is not warranted, as the positive predictive value for MOG-IgG is only 72%, and routine testing may lead to a significant increase in false positives 15 , 16 . Patients with AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD were not necessarily tested for MOG-IgG due to the rare coexistence of both antibodies 14 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The live cell-based MOG-IgG assay is a useful diagnostic tool for the determination of MOGAD, but sometimes it will lead to the potential for false positive results [ 22 ]. Previous studies showed that the positive predictive value (PPV) for MOG-IgG increased depending on the growth of the serum MOG-IgG titre cut-off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sechi et al published titer dependent PPV as follows: 100% for 1:1000, 82% for 1:100, 51% for titers 1:20–1:40 [21 ▪▪ ]. In a study of 1877 patients, Manzano et al noted that a titer threshold of ≥1:40, rather than ≥1:20, improved the PPV for MOG-IgG from 85.9% to 92.3% [22 ▪ ]. Notably, numerical cut-off values need to be considered in the right clinical context, as PPV is dependent upon disease prevalence within a given population [22 ▪ ].…”
Section: How Reliable Are Ancillary Investigations In the Diagnosis O...mentioning
confidence: 99%