2010
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.10088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive quadrant dependence tests for copulas

Abstract: In this paper the interest is in testing the null hypothesis of positive quadrant dependence (PQD) between two random variables. Such a testing problem is important since prior knowledge of PQD is a qualitative restriction that should be taken into account in further statistical analysis, for example, when choosing an appropriate copula function to model the dependence structure. The key methodology of the proposed testing procedures consists of evaluating a “distance” between a nonparametric estimator of a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(X 1 , X 2 ) s− o (X ⊥ 1 , X ⊥ 2 )), where (X ⊥ 1 , X ⊥ 2 ) is a copy of (X 1 , X 2 ), but with independent components. The statistical tools of Section 4 and Section 5 could then be adapted in order to provide not only interesting extensions of the tests of Scaillet (2005) and Gijbels, Omelka and Sznajder (2010) to s-PQD and s-NQD, Now since (X 1 , X 2 ) s− o (Y 1 , Y 2 ) holds if and only if (F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 )) s−ICX (Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 )), Characterization 3.1 of Denuit, Lefèvre and Mesfioui (1999) for the s-increasing convex order may be formulated as E{O s (u 1 , u 2 ;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))} ≤ E{O s (u 1 , u 2 ;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))}, E{O (i1,s2) (0, u 2 ;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))}≤E{O (i1,s2) (0, u 2 ;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i 1 <s 1 , E{O (s1,i2) (u 1 , 0;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))}≤E{O (s1,i2) (u 1 , 0;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i 2 <s 2 , E{O i (0, 0;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))} ≤ E{O i (0, 0;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i < s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(X 1 , X 2 ) s− o (X ⊥ 1 , X ⊥ 2 )), where (X ⊥ 1 , X ⊥ 2 ) is a copy of (X 1 , X 2 ), but with independent components. The statistical tools of Section 4 and Section 5 could then be adapted in order to provide not only interesting extensions of the tests of Scaillet (2005) and Gijbels, Omelka and Sznajder (2010) to s-PQD and s-NQD, Now since (X 1 , X 2 ) s− o (Y 1 , Y 2 ) holds if and only if (F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 )) s−ICX (Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 )), Characterization 3.1 of Denuit, Lefèvre and Mesfioui (1999) for the s-increasing convex order may be formulated as E{O s (u 1 , u 2 ;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))} ≤ E{O s (u 1 , u 2 ;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))}, E{O (i1,s2) (0, u 2 ;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))}≤E{O (i1,s2) (0, u 2 ;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i 1 <s 1 , E{O (s1,i2) (u 1 , 0;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))}≤E{O (s1,i2) (u 1 , 0;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i 2 <s 2 , E{O i (0, 0;F 1 (X 1 ),F 2 (X 2 ))} ≤ E{O i (0, 0;Ḡ 1 (Y 1 ),Ḡ 2 (Y 2 ))} ∀i < s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While testing for the latter hypothesis, i.e., that Y is positively regression dependent on X, or testing for positive quadrant dependence has recently drawn some attention in the literature, see Delgado and Escanciano (2012); Lee et al (2009); Denuit and Scaillet (2004); Scaillet (2005); Gijbels et al (2010), there does not exist an omnibus test for the hypothesis of any of the tail monotonicity concepts defined above, at least to the best of our knowledge. It is the purpose of this paper to fill this gap.…”
Section: Ltd(y |X) Ltd(x|y ) Rti(y |X) or Rti(x|y ) Implies Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data sets (e.g. Delgado and Escanciano (2012);Scaillet (2005); Gijbels et al (2010)). Exploiting a recent block multiplier bootstrap method, see Bücher and Ruppert (2012), our proposed test on tail monotonicity goes beyond this and can also be applied to serially dependent, strongly mixing data sets.…”
Section: Ltd(y |X) Ltd(x|y ) Rti(y |X) or Rti(x|y ) Implies Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to study on stronger definitions of dependence, Lehmann (1966) makes far-reaching contributions to the characterization of quadrant dependence. For literatures about this concept, see for instance, Denuit and Scaillet (2004), Scaillet (2005), Kallenberg (2008), Dhaene et al (2009), Gijbels et al (2010) and Ledwina and Wylupek (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%