2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aml.2015.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive solutions of quasilinear Schrödinger equations with critical growth

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWe consider a class of quasilinear Schrödinger equations of the formWhen 3 < p < 22 * − 1, some existence results have been established by several authors in recent years. Here we are interested in the case that 1 < p ≤ 3. The existence of positive solutions is proved by the variational method. Both well potentials and periodic ones are considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coming back to problem (1.1), we note that issues about existence and multiplicity of solutions for equations related to the equation in (1.1) (since positive, negative to nodal solutions) have been treated by a number of researchers recently, but there is no accurate results for existence of solutions to (1.1), that is, with the blow up behavior for the solutions. See for instance [12,20,5,2,18,19,22] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coming back to problem (1.1), we note that issues about existence and multiplicity of solutions for equations related to the equation in (1.1) (since positive, negative to nodal solutions) have been treated by a number of researchers recently, but there is no accurate results for existence of solutions to (1.1), that is, with the blow up behavior for the solutions. See for instance [12,20,5,2,18,19,22] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Zeng, Zhang and Zhou [30] studied the positive solutions of a quasilinear Schrödinger equation with Hardy potential and critical exponent. For more information about change of variable approach, we refer to [13,24,29,8,26,14] and references therein. However, this method depends heavily on the special structure of the quasilinear term and can not be generalized to treating more general quasilinear problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%