2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POSN: A privacy preserving decentralized social network app for mobile devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without loss of generality, we can assume that the selected privacy enforcement models allow users to protect the contents they publish by defining the group of users who can access these contents. As a matter of fact, Section 2 shows that a very common solution to express privacy preferences in DOSNs LKH+TGDH [31] Vis-a-Vis [8] LifeSocial.KOM [10] DOSN LKH [28,32] My3 [34] DECENT [43] LKH+OFT [30] DiDuSoNet [36] SocialGate [12] Shi R.H. et al [44] Privacy Policy [38,39] LotusNet [13] ELK [45] Trust [35] Contrail [42] OFT [33] Zeng S. et al [46] ProofBook [40] LKH [29] eXO [47] Safebook [7] DGKD [48] Solid [49] SuperNova [14] Bortoli S. et al [50] LibreSocial [41] BCOSN [51] WebP2P [52] Megaphone [53] SEDOSN [54] ReClaim [55] PSON [56] (and OSNs) is the definition of groups of users. An alternative solution to specify the users who can access a content is the one that expresses privacy preferences through attribute based access control policies.…”
Section: Classification Of the Content Privacy Enforcement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without loss of generality, we can assume that the selected privacy enforcement models allow users to protect the contents they publish by defining the group of users who can access these contents. As a matter of fact, Section 2 shows that a very common solution to express privacy preferences in DOSNs LKH+TGDH [31] Vis-a-Vis [8] LifeSocial.KOM [10] DOSN LKH [28,32] My3 [34] DECENT [43] LKH+OFT [30] DiDuSoNet [36] SocialGate [12] Shi R.H. et al [44] Privacy Policy [38,39] LotusNet [13] ELK [45] Trust [35] Contrail [42] OFT [33] Zeng S. et al [46] ProofBook [40] LKH [29] eXO [47] Safebook [7] DGKD [48] Solid [49] SuperNova [14] Bortoli S. et al [50] LibreSocial [41] BCOSN [51] WebP2P [52] Megaphone [53] SEDOSN [54] ReClaim [55] PSON [56] (and OSNs) is the definition of groups of users. An alternative solution to specify the users who can access a content is the one that expresses privacy preferences through attribute based access control policies.…”
Section: Classification Of the Content Privacy Enforcement Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the members of group G use K G for accessing the contents published in the group. For instance, PSON [56], Safebook [7], LotusNet [13], Contrail [42], ProofBook [40], SuperNova [14], and Megaphone [53] exploit the symmetric group key to encrypt all the contents shared in a group, i.e., C 0 , C 1 , .....C n .…”
Section: Encryption-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] developed an approach that uses the Ciphertext-Policy Attribute-Based Encryption (CP-ABE) toolkit and Google Drive to hold encrypted messages. A cloudbacked P2P with decentralized and encrypting capability for personalized online social networking was proposed by [36]. In a related work, an infrastructure surrogate with content key that is symmetrically random, and in turn is encrypted with a proper ABE key was developed by [25].…”
Section: State-of-the-art In Online Social Network Sensitive Data Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, these services expose the sensitive information of users such as their location and the location privacy is especially concerned in these systems. Recently, there have been many researches which are conducted to tackle this problem [54][55][56][57]. In the research of [16], the negative survey was used to resolve the problem.…”
Section: Privacy In Mobile Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%