2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja023712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible Ceres bow shock surfaces based on fluid models

Abstract: The hot electron beams that Dawn detected at Ceres can be explained by fast‐Fermi acceleration at a temporary bow shock. A shock forms when the solar wind encounters a temporary atmosphere, similar to a cometary coma. We use a magnetohydrodynamic model to quantitatively reproduce the 3‐D shock surface at Ceres and deduce the atmosphere characteristics that are required to create such a shock. Our most simple model requires about 1.8 kg/s, or 6 × 1025/s water vapor production rate to form such a shock. Such an … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, even the molecules moving fast enough to escape Vesta and Ceres will most likely photodissociate prior to escaping their gravitational pull. In this sense, Ceres and Vesta behave similarly to comets in the Solar System, which eject water molecules that ultimately photodissociate prior to escaping, interact with the local electromagnetic field, and stream antisunward, forming an ion tail; this is consistent with the detected plasma bow shock at Ceres (Jia et al, 2017). However, these molecules are moving very fast (minimum speeds of five and two atmospheric scale heights per hour for Ceres and Vesta respectively), and generally leave the atmosphere/exosphere prior to photodissociating.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Thus, even the molecules moving fast enough to escape Vesta and Ceres will most likely photodissociate prior to escaping their gravitational pull. In this sense, Ceres and Vesta behave similarly to comets in the Solar System, which eject water molecules that ultimately photodissociate prior to escaping, interact with the local electromagnetic field, and stream antisunward, forming an ion tail; this is consistent with the detected plasma bow shock at Ceres (Jia et al, 2017). However, these molecules are moving very fast (minimum speeds of five and two atmospheric scale heights per hour for Ceres and Vesta respectively), and generally leave the atmosphere/exosphere prior to photodissociating.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Evidence of haze on Ceres (Nathues et al 2015;Thangjam et al 2016) is controversial . However, the detection of energetic electrons on three successive spacecraft orbits after a solar proton event can be interpreted as the by-product of a transient atmosphere (Russell et al 2016;Jia et al 2017;Villarreal et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of several possible explanations for such events would be a bow shock from the interaction of a solar energetic particle (SEP) event with an atmosphere. Jia et al (2017) modeled such a situation, finding that about 6 × 10 25 s −1 (2 kg/s) water vapor production would be required to form such a shock. found a correlation between detections of an exosphere and the inferred presence of solar energetic protons (SEP) at Ceres.…”
Section: Observations Of An Exosphere (Or Lack Thereof)mentioning
confidence: 99%