2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible ring material around centaur (2060) Chiron

Abstract: We propose that several short-duration events observed in past stellar occultations by Chiron were produced by ring material. Some similarities between these events and the characteristics of Chariklo's rings could indicate common mechanisms around centaurs. From a reanalysis of the stellar occultation data in the literature, we determined two possible orientations of the pole of Chiron's rings, with ecliptic coordinates λ = (352 ± 10)• , β = (37 ± 10)• . The mean radius of the rings is (324 ± 10) km. One can … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
216
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
216
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results provide another (quantitative) proof that the particle size distribution of Saturn's rings is not primordial. The same size distributions are expected for other collision-dominated rings, such as the rings of Uranus (42,43), Chariklo (44,45), and Chiron (46,47) and possibly around extrasolar objects (48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, our results provide another (quantitative) proof that the particle size distribution of Saturn's rings is not primordial. The same size distributions are expected for other collision-dominated rings, such as the rings of Uranus (42,43), Chariklo (44,45), and Chiron (46,47) and possibly around extrasolar objects (48)(49)(50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Recent reinterpretation of occultation data of the secondlargest Centaur, 2060 Chiron, as possible evidence of rings (Ortiz et al 2015;Ruprecht et al 2015) has further sharpened interest in ways to form rings around small bodies which have had close encounters with giant planets. Dynamical formation mechanisms proposed thus far for Centaur ring systems (see, for example, Braga-Ribas et al 2014;Duffard et al 2014; M. El Moutamid 2014, private communication) fall into two broad categories which we discuss in light of our findings in Section 2.…”
Section: Constraints On Dynamical Formation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, bottom panel, shows the detrended data (by fitting a linear function to the data and subtracting) from the top panel phased with the best-fit period, its amplitude is ∼0.1 mag. Its light-curve amplitude was found to be 0.088 mag in 1986 and 1988 (Bus et al 1989) and 0.044 mag in 1991 (Marcialis & Buratti 1993), but it was measured at 0.003±0.015 mag with data obtained in 2013 (Ortiz et al 2015). The raw data in Fig.…”
Section: Chiron (1977 Ub)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The rotational period of Chiron as determined by Bus et al (1989), Marcialis & Buratti (1993) or Sheppard et al (2008) & Jewitt 1990) and it may have a ring (Ortiz et al 2015;Ruprecht et al 2015). Because of this cometary activity, its absolute magnitude changes over time (Belskaya et al 2010).…”
Section: Chiron (1977 Ub)mentioning
confidence: 99%