2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible role of norepinephrine in cocaine-induced conditioned taste aversions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mechanism underlying the US preexposure effect (either with the same or different drugs) is not fully characterized, for some drugs, e.g., alcohol, nicotine and morphine, it is thought that changes to the drug during preexposure impact the effects of that (or a different drug) at conditioning, weakening its ability to induce aversions (Barker and Johns, 1978, Berman and Cannon, 1974, Hunt et al , 1985, Iwamoto and Williamson, 1984, Simpson and Riley, 2005). The impact of preexposure in the cross-drug design is generally thought to be the result of the development of tolerance to common aversive effects shared by the drugs, presumably due to some common mechanism of action (Riley and Simpson, 2001: Serafine and Riley 2009: Serafine and Riley 2010). It is interesting to note that the cross-drug preexposure effect has been previously reported with nicotine and alcohol (Kunin et al , 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mechanism underlying the US preexposure effect (either with the same or different drugs) is not fully characterized, for some drugs, e.g., alcohol, nicotine and morphine, it is thought that changes to the drug during preexposure impact the effects of that (or a different drug) at conditioning, weakening its ability to induce aversions (Barker and Johns, 1978, Berman and Cannon, 1974, Hunt et al , 1985, Iwamoto and Williamson, 1984, Simpson and Riley, 2005). The impact of preexposure in the cross-drug design is generally thought to be the result of the development of tolerance to common aversive effects shared by the drugs, presumably due to some common mechanism of action (Riley and Simpson, 2001: Serafine and Riley 2009: Serafine and Riley 2010). It is interesting to note that the cross-drug preexposure effect has been previously reported with nicotine and alcohol (Kunin et al , 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical dopamine fiber densities were examined in 50-μm coronal vibratome sections cut through six levels of frontal cortices (bregma +1.38 to +0.68 mm) of and two-bottle testing, as described (23). After acclimation, handling and 20 min/d access to water, mice were given four series of 20-min conditioning sessions during which they were provided access to 1 g/L saccharin solution, then injected within 20 min with 0, 5, 10 or 20 mg/kg cocaine i.p., then 2 d of water recovery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other work assessing the effects of cross-drug preexposure on aversion learning, both attenuating and potentiating effects have been reported. That is, preexposure to Compound A can weaken or strengthen the aversion induced by Compound B (De Beun et al, 1996; Gommans et al, 1998; Serafine and Riley, 2009; see also Riley and Simpson, 2001). Since preexposure can result in either effect, it is necessary to use doses during conditioning that induce intermediate aversions (to detect potentiation or attenuation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This prediction is based on work utilizing the cross-drug preexposure preparation (De Beun et al, 1996; Gommans et al, 1998; Serafine and Riley, 2009) in which exposure to one compound is given prior to aversion conditioning with another. Under such conditions, aversions to the second compound are often weakened, an effect commonly interpreted as being due to cross tolerance (or adaptation) to the shared aversion-inducing effects of the two drugs (Berman and Cannon, 1974; Jones et al, 2009; LeBlanc and Cappell, 1974; Simpson and Riley, 2005; Serafine and Riley, 2009; 2010; for reviews and alternative interpretations, see Cappell and LeBlanc, 1977; Randich and LoLordo, 1979; Riley and Simpson, 2001). In one of the first demonstrations of the use of this procedure for investigations of common stimulus properties, De Beun and colleagues (1993) reported that CTAs induced by the selective serotonin (5-HT) agonist 8-OHDPAT were blocked by preexposure to compounds that also had 5-HT agonist activity (for the same receptor subtype, e.g., 5-HT 1A ; see De Beun et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation