2007
DOI: 10.3354/ame046283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible sources of methane-derived carbon for chironomid larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finally confirms the assumptions based on carbon isotope signatures alone by other authors (Bunn & Boon 1993, Grey et al 2004a, b, Kelly et al 2004). Furthermore, this also supports the observation that higher numbers of Eubacteria (including MOB) rather than Archaea (including methanogens) are associated with chironomid larvae (Eller et al 2007, this issue).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This finally confirms the assumptions based on carbon isotope signatures alone by other authors (Bunn & Boon 1993, Grey et al 2004a, b, Kelly et al 2004). Furthermore, this also supports the observation that higher numbers of Eubacteria (including MOB) rather than Archaea (including methanogens) are associated with chironomid larvae (Eller et al 2007, this issue).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…An independent analysis of the larval gut as possible microhabitat for MOB revealed anoxic conditions throughout the gut, which prevent active growth of MOB as part of the gut microflora (Stief and Eller, 2006). The analysis of lake‐derived chironomid larvae by clone libraries for the eubacterial 16S rRNA gene from larval tissue and gut content provided further evidence that MOB are not symbionts of the larvae (Eller et al ., 2007). Furthermore, in experiment 1 only sediment‐associated MOB were provided as 13 C‐enriched food source, but even if the whole larval gut would have been filled up with sediment‐associated MOB, the measured larval δ 13 C signatures could not have exceeded the sediment signature as they did (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of this study demonstrate that endogenous bacterial populations in chironomids are stable. Eller et al (2007), who investigated the possible sources of methane-derived carbon from chironomid larvae, identified clone libraries from larval tissue and gut content. The majority of the identified clones in their study were related to known detoxifying bacteria and belonged to the following genera: Bacteroides, Clostridium, Dysgomonas, Hyphomicrobium , Methylobacillus, Methylobacter , Methylocaldum, and Methylomicrobium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%