2022
DOI: 10.1108/mmms-07-2022-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-buckling analysis of shell-like structures using an implicit dynamic time integration scheme

Abstract: PurposeThis paper aims to investigate post-buckling responses of shell-like structures using an implicit conservative-decaying time integration dynamic scheme.Design/methodology/approachIn this work, the authors have proposed the use of a four-node quadrilateral flat shell finite element with drilling rotational degree of freedom within the framework of an updated Lagrangian formulation mutually with an implicit conservative-dissipative time integration dynamic scheme.FindingsSeveral numerical simulations were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Circular plates' buckling analysis, considering isotropic and composite materials, explores the influence of thickness, number of layers, and cutouts through analytical and experimental approaches [3]. The post-buckling responses of shell-like structures are investigated using an implicit conservative-decaying time integration dynamic scheme [4]. Prismatic and hollow cross-sectional pipeline models are analyzed for critical buckling loads, taking thermal effects into account [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circular plates' buckling analysis, considering isotropic and composite materials, explores the influence of thickness, number of layers, and cutouts through analytical and experimental approaches [3]. The post-buckling responses of shell-like structures are investigated using an implicit conservative-decaying time integration dynamic scheme [4]. Prismatic and hollow cross-sectional pipeline models are analyzed for critical buckling loads, taking thermal effects into account [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2011) as well as on reduced scale (Prado et al ., 2016; Chen et al ., 1995; Owolabi et al ., 2003; Çam et al ., 2005; Prasad and Seshu, 2010; Li et al ., 2016). Advanced modeling techniques can also predict the structural behavior and damaging response of structural elements precisely (Xu and Luo, 2016; Pydah and Sabale, n.d.; Khudayarov and Turaev, 2022; Bekhadda et al ., 2019; Boutagouga and Mamouri, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the researchers are trying to develop some techniques based on EMA of incrementally loaded/cracked structures to detect damages, their location, the severity of damages and structures remaining life (Wang et al, 2012;Pe si c et al, 2015;Capozucca, 2013;Daneshjoo and Gharighoran, 2008;Li et al, 2020) both on a large scale (Wang et al, 2012;Wahab and Roeck, 1998;Brownjohn and Xia, 2000;Huth et al, 2005;Dilena et al, 2011;Polimeno et al, 2018;Shan and Li, 2020;Shakib et al, 2020;Nochebuena-Mora et al, 2021;Ditommaso et al, 2015;Mongelli et al, 2011) as well as on reduced scale (Prado et al, 2016;Chen et al, 1995;Owolabi et al, 2003;Çam et al, 2005;Prasad and Seshu, 2010;Li et al, 2016). Advanced modeling techniques can also predict the structural behavior and damaging response of structural elements precisely (Xu and Luo, 2016;Pydah and Sabale, n.d.;Khudayarov and Turaev, 2022;Bekhadda et al, 2019;Boutagouga and Mamouri, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%