2005
DOI: 10.1177/1368431005059703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Communist Modernization, Transition Studies, and Diversity in Europe

Abstract: The majority of studies of post-communism – habitually grouped under the heading of 'transitology' – understand the transition ultimately as a political and cultural convergence of the ex-communist societies with Western Europe. Even those critical approaches that regard the post-communist transition as a relatively unique phenomenon (as in the approaches of path dependency and neo-classical sociology) tend to conflate normative prescriptions with empirical descriptions and to move within an overall framework … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Kennedy (2002) speaks about the emergence of a transit culture. P. Blokker describes post-Communist modernity in Central and Eastern Europe as 'pluralist, creative, extremely diverse and institutionally differently manifested processes' (Blokker 2005). Some modernisation processes in post-Communist countries are in essence contrary to the modernisation processes in Western Europe: for instance, where Western modernity negated traditional authorities and the religiously legitimated political order, post-Communist Europe mostly sought ways of how to sneak nationalism and religion into public discourse (Podolinská et al 2013: 190-191).…”
Section: Mary Moves People and The Economic Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy (2002) speaks about the emergence of a transit culture. P. Blokker describes post-Communist modernity in Central and Eastern Europe as 'pluralist, creative, extremely diverse and institutionally differently manifested processes' (Blokker 2005). Some modernisation processes in post-Communist countries are in essence contrary to the modernisation processes in Western Europe: for instance, where Western modernity negated traditional authorities and the religiously legitimated political order, post-Communist Europe mostly sought ways of how to sneak nationalism and religion into public discourse (Podolinská et al 2013: 190-191).…”
Section: Mary Moves People and The Economic Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, this is not meant to exclude the imaginary of individual autonomy: as Wagner (1994) points out, the double imaginary signification of modernity is rooted in the notions of rational mastery and autonomy, and it is not our task here to reduce it to the former. However, we can lean on the work of other scholars who have shown the transitions to market-based society as emancipatory movements towards autonomy and self-determination (Blokker, 2005). Our task, as we see it, is to focus on a rationale which is frequently rooted in widely shared experiences of daily life and therefore in practices rather than in political philosophy.…”
Section: Conclusion: Escape From Arbitrarinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1994). The primary concerns of the field were convergence 7 (Blokker 2005; Sztompka 1993) and consolidation 8 (Bandelj and Radu 2006; Linz and Stepan 1996).…”
Section: The Washington Consensusmentioning
confidence: 99%