Post‐Deconstruction and the Rhetorics of Touch

Dougherty, Stephen

doi:10.1080/14797585.2011.525105

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Erin Manning (2007), for one, warns us against a “fusional fantasy” and points out that communication requires separation and a respect for alterity (the other). Jaques Derrida (2005) terms this as “the unbridgeable abyss” (p. 191) and warns against the idea of immediate access to the other, leading at worst to a blind re-appropriation of the alterity of the other (Dougherty, 2011, p. 82). The fourth balancing act thus has to do with retaining the idea of entangledness and mutual implication and at the same time respecting the necessary alterity of the other.…”

Section: The Fourth Balancing Act: Voicementioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Qualitative Inquiry: Four Balancing Acts in Crafting Alternative Stories to Live By

Rautio

2020

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Post-qualitative inquiry can be seen to challenge—not fix—at least four elements of what Elizabeth St. Pierre calls conventional humanist qualitative inquiry: the nature of data, the role of methods, the quest for increasing clarity, and the idea of an individual “voice.” In conducting post-qualitative research rather than offering replacements for these or completely renouncing them, I outline four key balancing acts. Unless understood as continuous acts of balancing, post-qualitative inquiry runs a risk of being identified as yet another isolated fortress of righteousness.

show abstract

Section: The Fourth Balancing Act: Voicementioning

confidence: 99%

Post-Qualitative Inquiry: Four Balancing Acts in Crafting Alternative Stories to Live By

Rautio

2020

Qualitative Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Understanding difference within notions of entanglement and blurring leads us to the materially and bodily relational notion of touch (e.g. Dougherty, 2011). Dougherty discusses three seminal works in cultural theory and the rhetorics of touch: Ann Weinstone's (2004) Avatar Bodies, Erin Manning's (2007) Politics of Touch, and Jean-Luc Nancy's (2000) Being Singular Plural.…”

Section: Entanglement Difference Touch and Intentionalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Answering the world: young children’s running and rolling as more-than-human multimodal meaning making

Hackett

Rautio

2019

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper makes a case for a view of young children's meaning-making in which human actants are not separate from, but deeply entwined in, a more-than-human world. In order to interrogate the more-than-human processes through which multimodal meaning-making emerges, we focus on meaning-making through running and rolling that we have observed in early childhood settings in Finland and the UK. In doing so, we rethink the process of bringing-into-relation that underpin multimodal literacy practices. Ingold's notion of correspondence is offered as a generative way to conceptualize the interplay between human and nonhuman elements as they 'make themselves intelligible to each other' (p.97). We show how posthuman theory offers the possibility for reconceptualising emergence and intentionality, within young children's meaning-making. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Post‐Deconstruction and the Rhetorics of Touch

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Post-Qualitative Inquiry: Four Balancing Acts in Crafting Alternative Stories to Live By

Post-Qualitative Inquiry: Four Balancing Acts in Crafting Alternative Stories to Live By

Answering the world: young children’s running and rolling as more-than-human multimodal meaning making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About