2017
DOI: 10.1111/iar.12174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐depositional alteration of shallow‐marine tsunami‐induced sand layers: A comparison of recent and ancient tsunami deposits, Onagawa Bay, northeastern Japan

Abstract: Core data examined in this study reveal that original sedimentary structures in the tsunami deposits were possibly modified by bioturbation, and that the tsunamigenic coarse‐grained deposit can be distinguished from ordinary background deposits based mainly on textural differences among the sediments in the semi‐enclosed bay. Thus, recognition of the effects of post‐depositional alteration of ancient tsunami deposits is important for the identification of paleotsunami events in the geological record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of drawing the topmost limit of L1 and L2 events might be explained by the fact that tsunami deposits can be modified or removed by subsequent physical (Shinozaki et al, 2015;Tamura et al, 2015) and/or biological processes (Seike et al, 2016). Indeed, after the 2011 tsunami some offshore stations were monitored, revealing that the recolonization by benthic organisms began within several months after the event (Seike et al, 2013), and post-depositional biogenic alteration continued over much longer timescales (Seike et al, 2016) concealing the topmost limit of the Tohoku-oki deposit (Seike et al, 2017). Furthermore, even if the Bh horizon represents an important stratigraphic signature recognizable all along the shelf (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complexity of drawing the topmost limit of L1 and L2 events might be explained by the fact that tsunami deposits can be modified or removed by subsequent physical (Shinozaki et al, 2015;Tamura et al, 2015) and/or biological processes (Seike et al, 2016). Indeed, after the 2011 tsunami some offshore stations were monitored, revealing that the recolonization by benthic organisms began within several months after the event (Seike et al, 2013), and post-depositional biogenic alteration continued over much longer timescales (Seike et al, 2016) concealing the topmost limit of the Tohoku-oki deposit (Seike et al, 2017). Furthermore, even if the Bh horizon represents an important stratigraphic signature recognizable all along the shelf (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the 2004 Indian Ocean and 2011 Tohoku-oki tsunamis, offshore surveys were conducted to collect material, mainly from the inner continental shelf [0 to 30 m below sea level (bsl)] and over the shelfbreak (>100 m bsl). These studies highlighted that in the marine realm the tsunami-related units are subjected to the action of currents, waves and bioturbation that occur immediately after their deposition Sakuna et al, 2012;Ikehara et al, 2014;Tamura et al, 2015;Yoshikawa et al, 2015;Seike et al, 2017). Thus, it is often not easy to recognize offshore tsunami deposits even when they are related to recent events or with a precise age control (Toyofuku et al, 2014) because of their potentially low preservation in shallow water due to reworking and transport by currents, waves (Weiss & Bahlburg, 2006) and gravity flows which disperse sediment on the continental shelves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…海啸和风暴潮是将近海沉积大规模搬运至海岸 带的主要事件 [24,25] . 对现代海啸和风暴潮的研究已 经证明这类灾害能够在海岸带形成延伸至内陆几百 米至几千米、厚度达几十厘米的岸上沉积 [24,26] , 其物 质来源包括近岸海底沉积和海滩沉积 [7,27] . 在排除河 流作用之后, 可以确认宋井和九溪澳的A, D两个沉 积层是约一千年前由海啸或风暴潮形成的产物.…”
Section: 材料与方法unclassified
“…They are well preserved as anomalous coarse layers in peat or mud deposits typical of low-energy terrestrial or shallow-seabed environments (Atwater, 1992;Bourgeois et al, 1988;Dawson & Stewart, 2007;Monecke et al, 2008;Sawai et al, 2015;Seike et al, 2016Seike et al, , 2017a. Although tsunami deposits might be modified or obliterated by subsequent physical (Shinozaki et al, 2015;Szczuci nski, 2012;Tamura et al, 2015) and/or biological processes (Seike et al, 2016), they can remain for long periods in calm coastal embayments (Seike et al, 2017a). This indicates that tsunamis have semipermanent effects on the seafloor topography and the grain-size composition of seafloor sediments; in other words, tsunami sedimentation is a short-term phenomenon that has a major effect on the benthic environment over the longer term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%