2022
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2021-0221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-fire early successional vegetation buffers surface microclimate and increases survival of planted conifer seedlings in the southwestern United States

Abstract: Climate change and fire-exclusion have increased the flammability of western United States forests, leading to forest cover loss when wildfires occur under severe weather conditions. Increasingly large high-severity burn patches limit natural regeneration because of dispersal distance, increasing the chance of conversion to non-forest. Post-fire planting can overcome dispersal limitations, yet warmer and drier post-fire conditions can still reduce survival. We examined how two shrub species with different stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work highlights several key drivers of postfire conifer regeneration, but the broadscale nature of our study means that we could not account for local and microsite conditions, fine-scale weather events, intraspecific variation, cone serotiny, or phenotypic plasticity. For example, competition or facilitation from shrubs ( 23 , 61 ), seed dispersal and predation ( 36 , 62 ), interannual variation in seed production ( 63 ), pathogens, herbivory, or edaphic factors not captured in our models may affect conifer establishment and likely vary across our study area. Short-term exposure to extreme conditions [e.g., high soil surface temperatures ( 64 )] can also cause seedling mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work highlights several key drivers of postfire conifer regeneration, but the broadscale nature of our study means that we could not account for local and microsite conditions, fine-scale weather events, intraspecific variation, cone serotiny, or phenotypic plasticity. For example, competition or facilitation from shrubs ( 23 , 61 ), seed dispersal and predation ( 36 , 62 ), interannual variation in seed production ( 63 ), pathogens, herbivory, or edaphic factors not captured in our models may affect conifer establishment and likely vary across our study area. Short-term exposure to extreme conditions [e.g., high soil surface temperatures ( 64 )] can also cause seedling mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fragmented, this live‐tree legacy is superior to complete cover loss because it will facilitate a greater number of species being available during ecosystem reassembly. Local variation in topography or different types of vegetation cover can also cause microclimate to deviate from regional climate sufficient to allow tree seedling establishment (Crockett & Hurteau, 2022; Marsh, Crockett, et al, 2022; Marsh, Krofcheck, et al, 2022). Persistence of mature trees combined with topographic and vegetation mediated microclimate may provide for continued forest cover persistence within landscapes.…”
Section: Geographical Persistence Of Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐severity fire, as defined in this study, resulted in nearly complete overstorey mortality, which also increased light availability at ground level. Although there are many additional changes to abiotic conditions following high‐severity fire, including altered soil nutrients and microclimatic changes (Muñoz‐Rojas et al., 2016; Pérez‐Valera et al., 2019; Crockett & Hurteau, 2022), the influence of increased light likely played a role in our finding of altered composition in high‐severity areas. The high‐severity areas are dominated by a different community of plants comprised mainly of exotic species with ruderal life histories, suggesting that these species are better able to take advantage of post‐fire light and nutrient resources than native and perennial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%