2018
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.13454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post‐glacial range revolutions in South European hares (Lepus spp.): Insights from ancient DNA and ecological niche modelling

Abstract: Aim:The distribution of hares (Lepus spp.) in southern Europe was markedly different at the Last Glacial Maximum. Historical hybridization during range replacements led to high frequencies of mtDNA introgression from Lepus timidus into populations of three other species in northern Iberian Peninsula, even though L. timidus subsequently disappeared from the region. We use palaeontological records to provide new insights on the biogeographic history of these range replacements, combining ancient DNA and ecologic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if sufficient material is available, a condition for employing the fossil/pollen record is that the interacting populations can be distinguished, despite their similarity as implied by hybridization. While one study on birch trees succeeded in identification of hybridizing taxa from pollen alone (Wang et al., ), another one on hares resorted to sequencing ancient DNA to establish to which taxon fossils belonged (Lado et al., ) (Table ). Given these limitations, the fossil/pollen record is unlikely to be broadly applicable to inferring historical hybrid zone movement.Range shifts of hybridizing populations have been inferred from species distribution modelling, as predicted habitat suitability for the population presumed to have been replaced decreased over time, while the reverse applies to the supposedly invading population (Figure ).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if sufficient material is available, a condition for employing the fossil/pollen record is that the interacting populations can be distinguished, despite their similarity as implied by hybridization. While one study on birch trees succeeded in identification of hybridizing taxa from pollen alone (Wang et al., ), another one on hares resorted to sequencing ancient DNA to establish to which taxon fossils belonged (Lado et al., ) (Table ). Given these limitations, the fossil/pollen record is unlikely to be broadly applicable to inferring historical hybrid zone movement.Range shifts of hybridizing populations have been inferred from species distribution modelling, as predicted habitat suitability for the population presumed to have been replaced decreased over time, while the reverse applies to the supposedly invading population (Figure ).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if sufficient material is available, a condition for employing the fossil/pollen record is that the interacting populations can be distinguished, despite their similarity as implied by hybridization. While one study on birch trees succeeded in identification of hybridizing taxa from pollen alone (Wang et al, 2014), another one on hares resorted to sequencing ancient DNA to establish to which taxon fossils belonged (Lado et al, 2018) (Table 1).…”
Section: Text Box Inferring Historical Hybrid Zone Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although hybrid zone movement has not previously been considered to be common (Buggs, 2007), the spatial and genetic signatures of moving hybrid zones are by now been well documented in a wide range of vertebrate taxa including fishes (Souissi et al, 2018), salamanders (Arntzen & Wallis, 1991; Wielstra, Burke, Butlin, Arntzen, et al, 2017), toads (Arntzen, 1978, 2019; Arntzen et al, 2017), birds (Carling & Zuckerberg, 2011) and mammals (Lado et al, 2018; Macholán et al, 2011). Two important reservations apply to our interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their present distribution ranges are the result of recurrent range changes, overlaps and hybridization events since late Pleistocene (Alves et al, 2008b;Melo-Ferreira et al, 2012;Seixas et al, 2018). The mountain hare (Lepus timidus) currently ranges from northern Europe to Far East Russia, and is present in some isolated populations, such as in Ireland, Great Britain and the Alps (Angerbjörn, 2018), but palaeontological records show that it was present much further south at the last glacial maximum, reaching the Iberian Peninsula (Altuna, 1970;Lado et al, 2018). Its subsequent northward retreat resulted from the post-glacial climate warming and possibly also from the invasion of temperate species (Melo-Ferreira et al, 2007;Acevedo et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%