2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.064803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-growth Fe deposition on the superconductivity of monolayer FeSe films on SrTiO3δ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We cannot make any quantitative statements on the size of l max S at this time -however, we would like to stress that free-standing iron-based monolayers are unstable. As such, they are necessarily epitaxially grown on a substrate, such as SrTiO 3 [96,97]. The bonding between FeSe and SrTiO 3 is not weak, involves a sharing of electrons (doping of FeSe [40]), and is known to strain the iron atoms [40,95] -leading to a small difference in lattice constant relative to the bulk [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We cannot make any quantitative statements on the size of l max S at this time -however, we would like to stress that free-standing iron-based monolayers are unstable. As such, they are necessarily epitaxially grown on a substrate, such as SrTiO 3 [96,97]. The bonding between FeSe and SrTiO 3 is not weak, involves a sharing of electrons (doping of FeSe [40]), and is known to strain the iron atoms [40,95] -leading to a small difference in lattice constant relative to the bulk [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this manuscript is two fold: lay down the general theoretical framework necessary for future investigations into a new class of moire heterostructures, as well as provide a clear proposal for immediate experimental exploration of a specific device composed of either FeSe/SrTiO 3 [26,[95][96][97] or FeTe/SrTiO 3 [52,55] monolayers. To this end we have organized this paper in such a way as to prioritize the experimental proposal laid out in this Intro, starting first with details specific to moire bands at Γ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the strong interface coupling limit, the 1 UC FeSe film consists of domains with diameters below hundred nanometers separated by unidirectional line defects, wherein the outer gap reaches at 20 meV in maximum. However, the gap magnitude decreases with reduced domain size and even vanishes in isolated domains with diameter below ~20 nm 25 . Besides the random and drastic variation of pairing gaps in the sub-micron scale, the pairing gaps exhibit lateral gradient reduction of ~2 meV per millimeter, resulting from the lateral oxygen gradient accumulation due to their spontaneous flow under the electric field 23 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The latter is evidenced by the varied gap magnitude from 12 to 17 meV in a couple of millimeters with the gradient distribution of oxygen vacancies (O v ) spontaneously formed under an electric field [ 10 ]. Third, the lattice mismatch and coherent FeSe/TiO 2 coupling lead to tens-of-nanometer-scaled domains in monolayer FeSe separated by line defects of Fe vacancies [ 8 , 21 ], introducing in-plane electronic confinement in turn. Consequently, the electronic structure and paring strength in the monolayer FeSe vary on the nanometer scale [ 10 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the lattice mismatch and coherent FeSe/TiO 2 coupling lead to tens-of-nanometer-scaled domains in monolayer FeSe separated by line defects of Fe vacancies [ 8 , 21 ], introducing in-plane electronic confinement in turn. Consequently, the electronic structure and paring strength in the monolayer FeSe vary on the nanometer scale [ 10 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%