2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-neoliberal energy modernity and the political economy of the landlord state in Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Coronil (1997), the dialectic between capital, labour and land makes the landlord state an independent economic actor rather than simply a mere political actor dependent on capital (see also Emel et al. 2011; Purcell and Martinez 2018).…”
Section: Global Production Network the Landlord State And Ground Rentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Coronil (1997), the dialectic between capital, labour and land makes the landlord state an independent economic actor rather than simply a mere political actor dependent on capital (see also Emel et al. 2011; Purcell and Martinez 2018).…”
Section: Global Production Network the Landlord State And Ground Rentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecuador’s debt to China stood at 38.7 percent of its GDP in 2017 (Koening, 2017). When Ecuador invited Chinese state-owned companies to construct a series of sustainable energy projects, many influential social movement leaders and intellectuals criticized the government’s reliance on Chinese capital and debt for resource extraction as reproducing the neoliberal development model (Purcell and Martinez, 2018). In response, the Ecuadorian government increased oversight to protect workers’ rights and benefits as a means of justifying its legitimacy (Hawkins, 2011).…”
Section: Context: the Role Of China In Ecuador’s Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until approximately 2012, the government was able to exert higher control and extract increasing rents from companies without jeopardizing investments. In addition, new lending acquired in exchange for untapped oil translated into new dynamics of mortgaging underground resources (Purcell & Martínez 2018). Third, surplus rents channelled through direct spending or currency subsidies were used politically to benefit a new model of authoritarian governance, closely associated with the figure of the president, rewarding loyalty and punishing dissent (Ellner 2018).…”
Section: The Decay Of the Rentier Economymentioning
confidence: 99%