Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas: An Introduction

From Neoliberalism to Neo-developmentalism? The Political Economy of Post-crisis Argentina (2002–2015)

“…After a phase of rolling back the state, extensive marketization, and welfare retrenchment in the 1980s and 1990s in Latin America, the region witnessed the emergence of New Left projects which sought for a new balance between states and markets. This marked a revival of state activism and interventionism in economic management and welfare provision based on local ideas about development as part of the resurgence of the Left in the past decade (Grugel and Riggirozzi, 2009;Heidrich and Tussie, 2009;MacDonald and Ruckert, 2009;Levitsky and Roberts, 2011;Panizza, 2009). …”

“…This assigned the state a more dynamic role to guide and regulate markets, drive industrialization and enhance social equality (Grugel and Riggirozzi, 2009;MacDonald and Ruckert, 2009). As Grugel and Riggirozzi (2012) stated, as a political and economic project, post-neoliberalism marked the emergence of a new and active role for the state:…”

Variedades de neoliberalismo. Innovación conceptual para el análisis del rol del Estado en los mercados

“…En consecuencia, ¿se acabó el neoliberalismo en América Latina? Por cierto, fenómenos en la década de los 2000, por ejemplo el llamado «giro hacia la izquierda» (Dabène, 2012;Levitsky y Roberts, 2011;Luna y Filgueira, 2009;Weyland, Madrid, y Hunter, 2010), la supuesta aparición de un modelo neodesarrollista (Bresser-Pereira, 2007) o episodios de movilizaciones (Silva, 2009), han llevado a interrogarse sobre el fin del neoliberalismo (McDonald y Ruckert, 2009). Se acuñó en este sentido el concepto de «posneoli-Revista de Estudios Políticos (nueva época) ISSN-L: 0048-7694, Núm.…”

Indigenous peoples vs peasant unions: land conflicts and rural movements in plurinational Bolivia

“…This occurred, in the first place, in the framework of the multicultural institutional reform implemented by neoliberal governments in the 1990s, and, more recently, in the so-called Movimento al Socialismo (MAS) 'cultural revolution'. The 'post-neoliberal' breakthrough and the 'Leftist turn' attributed to the Morales government 3 have generally attracted greater attention than have elements of continuity (Prashad andBallve 2006, Macdonald andRückert 2009). However, concerning the management of ethno-cultural diversity and resources, these two periods -the neoliberal and the 'post-neoliberal' -show a significant degree of consistency.…”