2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-operative complications following primary ACL reconstruction using allogenic and autogenic soft tissue grafts: Increased relative morbidity risk is associated with increased graft diameter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 Contrary to this historical popular belief, no patient in our allograft study group showed any signs of superficial or deep infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…18,19 Contrary to this historical popular belief, no patient in our allograft study group showed any signs of superficial or deep infection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Furthermore, allografts might significantly change the initial biomechanical properties after g-irradiation; whether the changes in biomechanical properties affect the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with g-irradiated allograft still remains controversial. [7][8][9][10][11][12] The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and Creaction protein (CRP) level are the most useful routine laboratory screening tests for diagnosing potential infection after surgery and determining the response to treatment. Previous studies have found similar clinical results between allograft and autograft.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of hardware removal is similar to other procedures, [6][7][8][9][10][11] such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, where screws or staple prongs are commonly proud or unicortical due to the nature of this type of hardware. [12][13][14] Hardware function (such as in ACL graft tunnel mismatch) must be considered, because repositioning of the hardware placed around an already well-secured surgical site or ACL graft could lead to significant graft damage. In reality, we all need to expect that some patients will require deep hardware removal because of the bulky fixation plates used, and this should not be considered a true "complication."…”
Section: See Related Article On Page 2141mentioning
confidence: 99%