2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-processing and testing-oriented design for additive manufacturing – A general framework for the development of hybrid AM parts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mishra et al [16] further emphasizes the importance of post-processing techniques, categorizing them into methods for support material removal, surface texture improvements, thermal and non-thermal post-processing, and aesthetic improvements. Schneberger et al [17] underscores the need for a comprehensive framework for the development of hybrid AM parts, which includes post-processing, testing, and life cycle monitoring. These studies collectively highlight the significance of post-processing in additive manufacturing for improving part quality and performance.…”
Section: The Problems Related To Polishing Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mishra et al [16] further emphasizes the importance of post-processing techniques, categorizing them into methods for support material removal, surface texture improvements, thermal and non-thermal post-processing, and aesthetic improvements. Schneberger et al [17] underscores the need for a comprehensive framework for the development of hybrid AM parts, which includes post-processing, testing, and life cycle monitoring. These studies collectively highlight the significance of post-processing in additive manufacturing for improving part quality and performance.…”
Section: The Problems Related To Polishing Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMPS gyroids do not require any postprocessing due to the use of computer-generated algorithms [22]. Designing components individually will increase surface quality for AM through reductions of re-chucking, orientation-based optimization, and geometry-based optimization allowing for e cient post-processing methods [20]. However, potential toolsets used to evaluate the ease of post-processing operations have been implemented for the use of powder bed fusion [21].…”
Section: Post-process Threshold Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical component for AM post-process techniques is the need for post-process threshold limitations [20]. Currently, there is a lack of research and accurate tools available to quantify limitations for AM postprocesses [21].…”
Section: Post-process Threshold Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major barriers to the optimal utilisation of metal additive manufacturing technologies have been identified as the nonexistence of standard procedures on powder recyclability (required for direct cost reduction), meeting surface quality requirements and finishing features like internal lattices/pathways [9]. In another perspective, the current level of maturity of MAM technologies is regarded not to be sufficient to guarantee consistency in producing high-quality parts [10] while other views acknowledged that there is a compelling need for requirements relating to qualification, quality assurance and life cycle monitoring of MAM-produced parts [11]. Notwithstanding, aerospace alloys like nickel-based superalloys and Ti alloys are being processed via the use of metal additive manufacturing (MAM) processes at the laboratory and industrial levels to gain a scientific understanding for the improvement and fabrication of useful components/parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%