2005
DOI: 10.1039/b416484a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-remediation evaluation of a LNAPL site using electrical resistivity imaging

Abstract: Present understanding of the earth's subsurface is most often derived from samples at discrete points (wells) and interpolations or models that interpret the space between these points. Electrical resistivity imaging techniques have produced an improved capability to map contaminants (especially NAPLs--NonAqueous Phase Liquids) away from traditional wells using actual field data. Electrical resistivity image data, confirmed by drilling, have demonstrated that LNAPL (Light NAPL--less dense than water, such as g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The profiles typically employed electrode spacings of 1 to 1.5 m with an associated depth of investigation of approximately 13 m, which included the vadose zone, alluvial aquifer, and bedrock. The resistivity sampling with the SuperSting R8/IP and subsequent inversion used a proprietary routine devised by Halihan et al (2005), which produced higher-resolution images than conventional techniques.…”
Section: Alluvial Floodplain Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profiles typically employed electrode spacings of 1 to 1.5 m with an associated depth of investigation of approximately 13 m, which included the vadose zone, alluvial aquifer, and bedrock. The resistivity sampling with the SuperSting R8/IP and subsequent inversion used a proprietary routine devised by Halihan et al (2005), which produced higher-resolution images than conventional techniques.…”
Section: Alluvial Floodplain Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data acquisition and inversion utilized a proprietary Oklahoma State University method (HF, OSU Office of Intellectual Property, 2004;Halihan et al, 2005) to acquire apparent resistivity data and convert them to a model resistivity profile. The HF method has been utilized successfully within a number of applications published in the peer-reviewed literature (Halihan et al, 2005;Ong et al, 2010;Heeren et al, 2010Heeren et al, , 2011Keppel et al, 2011;Halihan et al, 2011Halihan et al, , 2012Halihan et al, , 2013Christenson et al, 2012;Heeren et al, 2014). The method has even been used and accepted by government agencies, such as the Department of Defense and U.S. EPA.…”
Section: Electrical Resistivity Imaging (Eri)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A collinear array of multiple electrodes produces a dataset consisting of apparent resistivities at depths determined by the geometry of the electrode configuration (Herman, 2001). Mathematical inversion of the "apparent resistivity" creates a two dimensional (distance and depth) model of the resistivity of the earth material (Loke and Dahlin, 2002;Halihan et al, 2005;Slater, 2007). The resistivity of earth materials is non-unique, with many different materials having similar and overlapping resistivities (Zohdy et al, 1974;Burger et al, 2006), and interpreting the geology of subsurface resistivity patterns requires independent evidence, such as site stratigraphy, in situ or laboratory testing, or core samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As resistivity depends on properties such as saturation, solute concentration and temperature, timelapse ERT can be used to monitor natural and anthropogenic processes that cause changes in these properties, such as infiltration (Daily et al, 1992;Looms et al, 2008), saline intrusion (Slater and Sandberg, 2000;Ogilvy et al, 2007;, leachate recirculation (Guerin et al, 2004), and contaminated land remediation (Daily and Ramirez, 1995;LaBrecque et al, 1996;Slater and Binley, 2003;Halihan et al, 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%