Post‐Soviet Transition: Improving Health Services Delivery and Management

Abstract

During the post-Soviet transition of the last 2 decades, ex-Communist countries of the Eastern Bloc, including eastern and central Europe, the Soviet Union, and its satellite and aligned states, have undergone major health system reforms. Many health systems of those countries--previously adopting a Soviet-type Semashko model--are currently called "in transition," as reform agendas, such as shifting to a Bismarck, Beveridge, or mixed financing scheme or adopting new health delivery management policies, are still in development. In this article, we first review common characteristics of Semashko health systems (the predominant health system of Communist countries during the Soviet era) and then discuss the "new public management" principles that ex-Communist countries have recently started to adopt with various degrees of success. We then illustrate experiences with these principles using 2 case studies, from Russia and Albania, and propose health policy options for both cases. Based on a review of the literature and on the our work experience in Russia and Albania, we found that the 2 ex-Semashko systems have not fully capitalized on expected positive outcomes of new public management principles due to low local healthcare financing levels, depreciated healthcare infrastructure and operational capacities, overlapping and contradicting ideology and policies of the former and newer health systems, and finally, lack of leadership that has successful experience with these principles. In the case of pharmaceutical pricing, reimbursement, and access in Russia, we show how a well-intentioned but suboptimally designed and managed pharmaceutical coverage scheme has suffered moral hazard and adverse selection and has adversely impacted the new public management promise of efficient medicine coverage. In the case of Albania, the delayed investment in human resource reform within a depreciated and underfinanced delivery system has adversely affected the implementation of new public management principles.

Health system strengthening and hypertension awareness, treatment and control: data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

“…There are several reasons why many cases of hypertension are going undetected in China. The services provided by community health care in the country -which is based on the Soviet Semashko model 40 -are often as specialized as those available in general hospitals. However, there are more physicians than nurses available for community health care, and many of the physicians spend most of their working days sitting in their offices, waiting for patients.…”

Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Prevention in Russian Federation (RF)

“…So, as more there will be service, as much salary they will have. In such conditions medical stuff does not have any motivation to provide prevention procedures or to help patient to make up their individual behavior healthier [2].…”

“…The system was based on two main principles: free medical care access and emphasis on prevention of communicable diseases. Patients did not pay any money for their visit to doctor, medical care costs were covered by government [1,2].…”

A model for retention and continuity of care and treatment for opioid dependent injection drug users in the Russian Federation

“…The federal health care system in the Russian Federation is a post-Soviet system that is publically owned and financed, with the government managing resource allocation, and where health care professionals are government employees [9]. As a centrally planned and managed system, medical service provision is free and directed from Moscow through government decrees called "prekops".…”