1982
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-198208000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-Therapy CT-Detected Mass in Lymphoma Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There may be limitations in corroborating a CR in viscera by CT alone 20,21 and in those cases, a confirmatory biopsy may be necessary or lacking this, no CR assessment can be made.…”
Section: Visceral Disease Assessment Scoring and Definition Of Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There may be limitations in corroborating a CR in viscera by CT alone 20,21 and in those cases, a confirmatory biopsy may be necessary or lacking this, no CR assessment can be made.…”
Section: Visceral Disease Assessment Scoring and Definition Of Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often these abnormalities represented fibrotic scar with no viable tumor evident [18,19]. With the increasing use of CT, more specific criteria were needed to assess the significance of residual masses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of PET imaging helped to address the issue of residual masses detected after therapy, which frequently comprise inflammatory, necrotic, and fibrotic tissue rather than residual disease (14)(15)(16). This phenomenon proved especially problematic for lymphoma, for which the response assessment criteria relied solely on anatomic imaging.…”
Section: Historical Review Of Response Assessment In Solid Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%