Postacute Care for Older People in Community Hospitals: A Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

Young, John; Green, John; Forster, Anne; Small, Neil; Lowson, Karin; Bogle, Sue; George, James; Heseltine, D.; Jayasuriya, Tilak; Rowe, Jed

doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01456.x

Cited by 68 publications

(77 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There were seven papers reporting on four RCTs, 7,9,10,62,66,98,100 and two papers reporting on qualitative research embedded in two of the RCTs. 8,55 There were a further four papers reporting on three qualitative studies, and one paper on an observational cohort study.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…45,58 The majority of papers focused on patient outcomes (health, 7,9,10,61,62,66,98,100 experience and satisfaction 7,8,10,54,55,58,66 ), whereas two measured staff experience. 8,61 Other outcomes measured included organisational and resource efficiencies 61 and family and carer experience.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Five studies in 13 papers reported on the provision of post-acute care at community hospitals, [7][8][9][10][11]54,55,61,62,[98][99][100][101] one examined chemotherapy at community hospitals, 66 one considered emergency admissions 102 and one study presented data on end-of-life care across two papers. 45,58 The majority of papers focused on patient outcomes (health, 7,9,10,61,62,66,98,100 experience and satisfaction 7,8,10,54,55,58,66 ), whereas two measured staff experience.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, studies examining the impact of rehabilitation care for older people found that the community hospital setting was associated with greater independence at 6 months than the district general hospital setting. [7][8][9][10][11] Other work has pointed to the potential role of community hospitals in providing palliative care. 12 It is reported that community hospitals are perceived as friendly and service-user centred; for example, evidence from the 2011 Scottish Inpatient Patient Experience Survey found that community hospitals scored above the national average on many questions concerning patient experience, 13 and it has been suggested that community hospitals offer a better experience of care than acute hospitals by allowing more integration with patients' families and home life.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Community hospitals and their services in the NHS: identifying transferable learning from international developments – scoping review, systematic review, country reports and case studies

Pitchforth

Nolte

Corbett

et al. 2017

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe notion of a community hospital in England is evolving from the traditional model of a local hospital staffed by general practitioners and nurses and serving mainly rural populations. Along with the diversification of models, there is a renewed policy interest in community hospitals and their potential to deliver integrated care. However, there is a need to better understand the role of different models of community hospitals within the wider health economy and an opportunity to learn from experiences of other countries to inform this potential.ObjectivesThis study sought to (1) define the nature and scope of service provision models that fit under the umbrella term ‘community hospital’ in the UK and other high-income countries, (2) analyse evidence of their effectiveness and efficiency, (3) explore the wider role and impact of community engagement in community hospitals, (4) understand how models in other countries operate and asses their role within the wider health-care system, and (5) identify the potential for community hospitals to perform an integrative role in the delivery of health and social care.MethodsA multimethod study including a scoping review of community hospital models, a linked systematic review of their effectiveness and efficiency, an analysis of experiences in Australia, Finland, Italy, Norway and Scotland, and case studies of four community hospitals in Finland, Italy and Scotland.ResultsThe evidence reviews found that community hospitals provide a diverse range of services, spanning primary, secondary and long-term care in geographical and health system contexts. They can offer an effective and efficient alternative to acute hospitals. Patient experience was frequently reported to be better at community hospitals, and the cost-effectiveness of some models was found to be similar to that of general hospitals, although evidence was limited. Evidence from other countries showed that community hospitals provide a wide spectrum of health services that lie on a continuum between serving a ‘geographic purpose’ and having a specific population focus, mainly older people. Structures continue to evolve as countries embark on major reforms to integrate health and social care. Case studies highlighted that it is important to consider local and national contexts when looking at how to transfer models across settings, how to overcome barriers to integration beyond location and how the community should be best represented.LimitationsThe use of a restricted definition may have excluded some relevant community hospital models, and the small number of countries and case studies included for comparison may limit the transferability of findings for England. Although this research provides detailed insights into community hospitals in five countries, it was not in its scope to include the perspective of patients in any depth.ConclusionsAt a time when emphasis is being placed on integrated and community-based care, community hospitals have the potential to assume a more strategic role in health-care delivery locally, providing care closer to people’s homes. There is a need for more research into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community hospitals, the role of the community and optimal staff profile(s).FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Community hospitals and their services in the NHS: identifying transferable learning from international developments – scoping review, systematic review, country reports and case studies

Pitchforth

Nolte

Corbett

et al. 2017

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the systematic review by Bachmann et al, 4 of the eight general geriatric rehabilitation studies, only two were UK studies, both of which were undertaken in community hospitals. 67,68 In each country the orientation of primary care services differs, which may affect both the delivery of and the communication between services. Different perceptions of care by professionals in alternative care settings and country-specific funding arrangements may also influence timely discharge.…”

Section: Cost-effectiveness Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of a new community in-reach rehabilitation service with the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of an established hospital-based rehabilitation service for older people: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with microcost and qualitative analysis – the Community In-reach Rehabilitation And Care Transition (CIRACT) study

Sahota

Pulikottil-Jacob

Marshall

et al. 2016

Health Serv Deliv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(2016) Comparing the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of a new community in-reach rehabilitation service with the cost-effectiveness and clinical effectiveness of an established hospital-based rehabilitation service for older people: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with microcost and qualitative analysis -the Community In-reach Rehabilitation And Care Transition (CIRACT) study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 4 (7). ISSN 2050-4357 Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/33469/1/Sahota%20Health%20Serv%20Del%202016.pdf Copyright and reuse:The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. This article is made available under the University of Nottingham End User licence and may be reused according to the conditions of the licence. For more details see: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk This report should be referenced as follows: This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/). HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCHEditorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Services and Delivery Research journalReports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research. It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation. The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.For more information about the HS&DR programme please visit the webs...

show abstract

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital

Ellis

Gardner

Tsiachristas

et al. 2011

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

561

174

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person in order to develop a co-ordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long-term follow up. Objectives We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of CGA in hospital for older adults admitted as an emergency. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AARP Ageline, and handsearched high-yield journals. Selection criteria We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing CGA (whether by mobile teams or in designated wards) to usual care. Data collection and analysis Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted published data. Main results Twenty-two trials evaluating 10,315 participants in six countries were identified. Patients in receipt of CGA were more likely to be alive and in their own homes at up to six months (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42, P = 0.0002) and at the end of scheduled follow up (median 12 months) (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, P = 0.003) when compared to general medical care. In addition, patients were less likely to be institutionalised (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88, P < 0.0001). They were less likely to suffer death or deterioration (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90, P = 0.001), and were more likely to experience improved cognition in the CGA group (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.01, P = 0.02). Subgroup interaction in the primary outcomes suggests that the effects of CGA are primarily the result of CGA wards. Authors’ conclusions Comprehensive geriatric assessment increases a patient’s likelihood of being alive and in their own home at up to 12 months.

show abstract

Postacute Care for Older People in Community Hospitals: A Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Cited by 68 publications

References 22 publications

Community hospitals and their services in the NHS: identifying transferable learning from international developments – scoping review, systematic review, country reports and case studies

Community hospitals and their services in the NHS: identifying transferable learning from international developments – scoping review, systematic review, country reports and case studies

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About