“…In addition, the movement of leaf litter from infected orchards through vehicle/ machine movement is also important (Dewdney et al, 2018;Silva-Junior et al, 2016a). Citrus fruit is not considered to be a realistic pathway for spread of P. citricarpa to new areas (USDA APHIS, 2010) for the following reasons: (i) the airborne ascospores cannot be produced on fruit, (ii) pycnidia are only produced in certain fruit lesion types (Brentu et al, 2012;FAO, 2014;Kotzé, 2000;Marques et al, 2012;OEPP/EPPO, 2009;Wager, 1952) and conidia are short-lived with low germination ability (Kiely, 1948b), (iii) conidium dispersal from fruit lesions is by means of short-distance (<1 m) wash-down dispersal (Kiely, 1948b;McOnie, 1965;Spósito et al, 2008Spósito et al, , 2011Whiteside, 1967), (iv) standard packhouse treatments and cold storage effectively control P. citricarpa infections (Korf et al, 2001;Lucon et al, 2010;Rappussi et al, 2009Rappussi et al, , 2011Schreuder et al, 2018;Seberry et al, 1967;Yan et al, 2016), and CBS lesions on fruit or discarded peel segments have a very low reproductive potential (Korf et al, 2001;Schreuder et al, 2018;Schutte et al, 2014), and (v) fallen leaves are not susceptible to infection (Truter et al, 2007). Inter-state movement of commercial packhouse-treated fruit from CBS present to CBS-absent areas is therefore permitted in the USA, in line with their Pest Risk Analysis conclusion that fruit is not a realistic pathway (USDA APHIS, 2011).…”