“…In addition, the movement of leaf litter from infected orchards through vehicle/machine movement is also important (Dewdney et al ., ; Silva‐Junior et al ., ). Citrus fruit is not considered to be a realistic pathway for spread of P. citricarpa to new areas (USDA APHIS, ) for the following reasons: (i) the airborne ascospores cannot be produced on fruit, (ii) pycnidia are only produced in certain fruit lesion types (Brentu et al ., ; FAO, ; Kotzé, ; Marques et al ., ; OEPP/EPPO, ; Wager, ) and conidia are short‐lived with low germination ability (Kiely, ), (iii) conidium dispersal from fruit lesions is by means of short‐distance (<1 m) wash‐down dispersal (Kiely, ; McOnie, ; Spósito et al ., , ; Whiteside, ), (iv) standard packhouse treatments and cold storage effectively control P. citricarpa infections (Korf et al ., ; Lucon et al ., ; Rappussi et al ., , ; Schreuder et al ., ; Seberry et al ., ; Yan et al ., ), and CBS lesions on fruit or discarded peel segments have a very low reproductive potential (Korf et al ., ; Schreuder et al ., ; Schutte et al ., ), and (v) fallen leaves are not susceptible to infection (Truter et al ., ). Inter‐state movement of commercial packhouse‐treated fruit from CBS present to CBS‐absent areas is therefore permitted in the USA, in line with their Pest Risk Analysis conclusion that fruit is not a realistic pathway (USDA APHIS, ).…”