“…First, taken together with other sets of data that conventional diagnosis via multi-territorial malperfusion alone provides a similar sensitivity of 77%, but lower specificity of 55%, for predicting multiple coronary ischemia, 9 and that these values are not improved even in combination with an increased TID ratio, 9 the criteria proposed here (ie, PMS together with multi-territorial ischemia) has sufficient power of detecting broad and multiple CAD and might give substantial priority to stress SPECT test as a first-line extensive noninvasive examination following routine screening tests to diagnose multiple CAD in the clinical setting. In fact, invasive CAG is currently still serving as the best standard for detecting coronary structural stenosis because it can provide detailed and complicated information at once precisely, regardless of heart rate and arrhythmia.…”