2002
DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.7.872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy

Abstract: PPROXIMATELY 38% OF POSTmenopausal women in the United States in 1995 used h o r m o n e r e p l a c e m e n t therapy (HRT), estrogen with or without progestin, to treat symptoms of menopause and prevent chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. 1 Although treatment of symptoms of menopause, such as hot flashes and urogenital atrophy, among others, is a common indication for short-term use, potential preventive effects of HRT on long-term health outcomes have become an increasingly i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
510
5
40

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 923 publications
(569 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(216 reference statements)
14
510
5
40
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, women who take HRT have access to health care, thus have a greater likelihood of being treated for co-morbidity or being motivated to undergo mammographic screening [27]. However, in the province of Limburg, the reduction in HRT use was not followed by a decrease in mammographic screening, in contrary the screening rose in that period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, women who take HRT have access to health care, thus have a greater likelihood of being treated for co-morbidity or being motivated to undergo mammographic screening [27]. However, in the province of Limburg, the reduction in HRT use was not followed by a decrease in mammographic screening, in contrary the screening rose in that period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between HRT and gastric adenocarcinoma warrants further research before any clinical implications would be appropriate, particularly given the initial enthusiasm about the seemingly protective effect of HRT against cardiovascular disease, which was later not supported (Nelson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10]. Le choix de cette réfé-rence a été motivé par la nature de cette publication : scientific review et par l'absence de données propres à la situation française.…”
Section: Sud-est 35unclassified