1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb03001.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative headache in young patients after spinal anaesthesia

Abstract: Summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1
5

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
48
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Many of the headaches that occur after spinal anaesthesia may not be the result of dural puncture and should be differentiated from the PDPHs by the patient's history. 13,25 The relatively high rate of PDPH that we describe for both spinal needles requires explanation. When the present study is compared with others using the 27 gauge Quincke needle, it appears that the patients in the present study were younger and followed up more closely than those reported by Flanagan et al 1 (PDPH rate of 3.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Many of the headaches that occur after spinal anaesthesia may not be the result of dural puncture and should be differentiated from the PDPHs by the patient's history. 13,25 The relatively high rate of PDPH that we describe for both spinal needles requires explanation. When the present study is compared with others using the 27 gauge Quincke needle, it appears that the patients in the present study were younger and followed up more closely than those reported by Flanagan et al 1 (PDPH rate of 3.7%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…,-4 Previously, we reported a PDPH rate of 19.6% in patients less than 40 yr of age using the 27 gauge Quincke needle. 5 The reported PDPH rates vary considerably, for example, PDPH rates for the 25 gauge Quincke needle range from 7.8% to 37.2%, 13,15,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and between 2% and 9.6% for the 26 gauge Quincke needle. 2,15,~9,24-27 While use of the 29 gauge Quincke needle has been reported to result in an incidence of PDPH between 0% and 2%, the failure rate of between 1.2% and 8% may make its use impractical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of CSF loss through the dural perforation (0.084-4.5 ml s -1 ) is generally greater than the rate of CSF production (0.35 ml min -1 ), specially with needle sizes larger than 25G. 2 The incidence of PDPH a <2% with a 29G needle; 2%-12% with a 26G Quincke needle; ~25% with a 25G needle; 3,4 40% with a 22G needle and PDPH is usually a self-limiting process, but Vandam and Dripps in 1956 reported that 72% of headaches resolved within a week 5 . PDPH usually responds to increased fluid intake, bed rest and analgesics.…”
Section: Discussion-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, tais condutas têm sido contestadas por outros autores como THORNBERRY e TOMAS (8) , BELDO e COLS (I) e FLAATEN e COLS ( 3 ) . Tais autores acreditam que, tanto a pennanência no leito, como a deambulação precoce, não interferem na incidência da cefaléia.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified