2018
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postoperative Outcome of the Modified Broström Procedure in the Active Duty Military Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range for Broström-related procedures was 73.2% (objective) to 94.7% (subjective). 9,10,12,14,15 The modified Watson-Jones procedure had a subjective satisfactory outcome of 80% and objective satisfactory outcome of 72%. 8 Colville's technique had an objective satisfactory outcome of 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The range for Broström-related procedures was 73.2% (objective) to 94.7% (subjective). 9,10,12,14,15 The modified Watson-Jones procedure had a subjective satisfactory outcome of 80% and objective satisfactory outcome of 72%. 8 Colville's technique had an objective satisfactory outcome of 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Multiple studies used different tests to determine rehabilitation from injury. These tests range include: single leg landing [8], asymmetry [9], risk factors [10], Functional Movement Screen (FMS) [11], the American Foot and Ankle Score Outcome (AOFAS), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) [12], and procedure and delaying outcomes [13][14][15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be no surprise then that retrospective cohort studies were vastly overrepresented in this field of study. Other cohort studies included either single military units [ 9 ] or took individual hospital databases [ 12 , 14 ]. Notably absent from the design are randomized control trials (RCT).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A return to competitive sport was documented in 7 articles. 17 Retrospective, cohort 3 (.24) 8/11 Takao (2021) 54 Retrospective, cohort 3 NR 7/11 Kulwin (2021) 33 Prospective, RCT 2 6 9/13 Li (2020) 38 Retrospective, cohort 3 39 6 7 8/11 Hanada (2020) 22 Prospective, cohort 4 (.12) 8/11 DeVries (2019) 14 Retrospective, cohort 3 23.56 6 7.6 (49-149) 8/11 Lee (2019) 35 Retrospective, case series 4 28.8 6 4.3 (25-38) 6/10 Li (2019) 37 Retrospective, cohort 3 46 6 21 8/11 Melton (2018) 44 Retrospective, case series 4 (.12) 7/10 Lopes (2018) 39 Prospective, cohort 3 9.6 6 4.3 8/11 Coetzee (2018) 10 Retrospective, case series 4 Median, 11.5 (6-27) 7/10 Russo (2016) 50 Retrospective, case series 4 (120-180) 7/10 Matsui (2016) 42 Retrospective, cohort 3 NR 9/11 Cho (2015) 7 Prospective, case series 4 31.4 (24-39) 8/10 Dierckman (2015) 15 Retrospective, case series 4 38 6 30 (24-107) 9/10 Cho (2015) 6 Prospective, case series 2 31.8 (24-41) 6/10 Petrera (2014) 48 Retrospective, case series 4 42 (24-60) 5/10 Miyamoto (2014) 46 Prospective, cohort 3 24 7/11 Maffulli (2013) 40 Retrospective, case series 4 104.4 6 32.5 (60-156) 7/10 Keklikc xi (2012) 29 Prospective, case series 4 76.1 (60-106) 5/10 Kennedy (2012) 30 Retrospective, case series 4 32 (12-47) 8/10 Kim (2011) 31 Retrospective, case series 4 15.9 (13-25) 5/10 Solakoglu (2003) 53 Retrospective, case series 4 20 (14-23) 6/10 Karlsson (1995) 28 Prospective, RCT 2 (.24) 5/13 a JBI, Joanna Briggs Institute; NR, not reported; RCT, randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Study Characteristics and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resuming sports and physical exercise is critical for maintaining health and avoiding morbidity after injury. 56 It has been documented that 73% to 100% of patients returned to sport participation after ankle ligament repair surgery 44,40 ; after anatomic reconstruction surgery, reported rates of return to sport (RTS) ranged from 83% to 93%. 10,15 This heterogeneity might be attributed to a variety of variables, including sex, treatment approach, strength impairments, psychological factors, and other physical alterations indirectly connected to injury and rehabilitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%