Military service members have increased requirements of shoulder weight bearing to perform duties. Operative intervention has increased for treatment of displaced middle one-third clavicle fractures. Complications of operatively treated clavicle fixation have not been extensively studied. A retrospective, longitudinal cohort chart evaluation was conducted of all active duty members undergoing fixation of middle one-third clavicle fractures, for complications between intramedullary pin fixation and plate constructs. This review found 62 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Thirty-three patients underwent intramedullary pin fixation with Hagie pins and 31 patients underwent precontoured superior clavicle plate fixation of their middle one-third clavicle fractures. Complications included wound infection, skin and/or soft tissue irritation, and need for unplanned hardware removal. The overall complication rate was 31% in the plate fixation group versus 9% in the intramedullary pin group (p = .024). All patients achieved fracture union with return to duty; however, increased overall complications were seen in the plate fixation group.

A 21-year-old active duty soldier presented with right shoulder pain and prominence over his right clavicle, with no history of trauma. He recalled that the deformity had been present for a long time, but only recently became painful. The onset of shoulder pain coincided with the beginning of his military service and the requirement to wear over-the-shoulder equipment such as back packs and load-bearing equipment. Physical examination revealed a prominence over the right midshaft clavicle with tenderness to palpation, full active range of motion of the shoulder, and that he was neurovascularly intact.

Instrumented spinal fusion is the gold standard treatment for surgical magnitude adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), with the goal being stable fusion without the need for additional procedures. The purpose of this study was to define the surgical return rates of AIS at a single center with respect to various instrumentation constructs used during initial spinal fusion. A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with AIS who underwent instrumented fusion with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Demographic information, implant type, and surgical approach for the primary surgery and all subsequent secondary operations were recorded. Four hundred eleven patients who underwent instrumented fusion for AIS during the study period met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six secondary operations were performed in 50 patients (12.2%). Symptomatic hardware, pseudarthrosis, and infection were the most common indications for secondary surgery. Posterior pedicle screw constructs had a lower secondary surgery rate (5.8%) compared with hybrid and combined fusions ( P <.05). The all hook, hybrid, anterior only, and combined fusions had secondary surgery rates of 13.0%, 18.5%, 10.0%, and 20.8%, respectively, which were not statistically different. When specifically comparing pedicle screw with hook constructs, there was a statistically lower pseudarthrosis rate ( P =.03) favoring pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients undergoing instrumented fusion for AIS are at some risk for subsequent surgery. To lessen that risk, pedicle screw constructs should be considered, as they have shown an overall lower secondary surgery rate and in particular a lower rate of pseudarthrosis. [ Orthopedics . 2019; 42(4):235–239.]

No abstract

No abstract