“…However, whether future earthquakes can be triggered by past events cannot be solely explained by studies of coseismic Coulomb stress changes (Mildon et al., 2019). The evolution of stress that brings a fault to rupture is mainly controlled by interseismic strain accumulation, while other transient stress changes can occur, such as postseismic effects due to viscoelastic relaxation (e.g., Bagge et al., 2019; Bagge & Hampel, 2017; Freed & Lin, 2001; Verdecchia & Carena, 2015, 2016; Verdecchia et al., 2018), postseismic fluid pressure changes (e.g., Albano et al., 2017, 2019; Bosl & Nur, 2002; Cocco & Rice, 2002; Miao et al., 2021; Noir et al., 1997; Vidale & Shearer, 2006), and dynamic seismic waves (e.g., Belardinelli et al., 2003; Gonzalez‐Huizar & Velasco, 2011; Velasco et al., 2008), and have been suggested to modify the distribution and magnitude of stress changes. Therefore, the inclusion of coseismic, postseismic and interseismic loading, reproducing the effect of the tectonic rates at which faults slip, appears to be the key to understanding patterns of occurrence of earthquakes, and examples from historical earthquakes (e.g., Mildon et al., 2019; Sgambato, Faure Walker, Mildon, & Roberts, 2020; Verdecchia & Carena, 2015, 2016; Wedmore et al., 2017) and propagating triggered earthquake sequences (Pondard et al., 2007) are consistent with this.…”