2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural control and automaticity in dyslexic children: The relationship between visual information and body sway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
46
2
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
46
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our findings, we could assume that dyslexic children are not able to use sensorial inputs in order to assure good postural control particularly when they have to perform a dual task. This hypothesis is in line with the study of Barela et al [72].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on our findings, we could assume that dyslexic children are not able to use sensorial inputs in order to assure good postural control particularly when they have to perform a dual task. This hypothesis is in line with the study of Barela et al [72].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Larger between-group differences may result from the application of more difficult and complex paradigms, for example those involving sensory modulation [13], perturbation of the consistency of the standing surface [16], or the presence of a secondary, distractor task [44]. Dual task environments in particular have been argued to provide superior paradigms for measuring the ability to automate motor tasks, because the presence of the secondary task requires reallocation of attention resources away from the primary task (for e.g., postural control), resulting in performance decrements and thereby mitigating against ceiling performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the prominence of phonological deficits as a potent risk factor [6][9], the phenotype of dyslexia often encompasses a broad constellation of information processing deficits that extend well-beyond the phonological domain [10][12]. One of these areas is in motor control, where previous studies have reported difficulties in measures of balance and posture that are associated both with dyslexia [13][18] and with reading skills across the range of abilities in the general population [19]. Nicolson, Fawcett & Dean [20] proposed that the apparent link between balance and reading in dyslexia may result from mild impairment of the development and functioning of the cerebellum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite differences in automaticity being a compelling suggestion, it is necessary to further explain “automaticity of what”? We have recently demonstrated using the moving room paradigm (i.e., paradigm used to observe the effect of dynamic changes in the visual environment on postural sway) that dyslexic children couple sensory information to body oscillation slightly different than their peers in upright stance while visual information was manipulated [10]. Based upon these results, we further suggested that motor performance of dyslexic individuals would be affected by their difficulty to transform multiple sensory cues available in relevant information to perform purposeful task in an automatic manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%