1995
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199505300-00034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postural effects of motion vision in young autistic children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
2
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
67
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These authors showed that autistic children exhibited higher thresholds in motion coherence perception (involving the dorsal pathway) than typically developing children, whereas these differences did not emerge for the formcoherence threshold (involving the ventral pathway). Also consistent with a dorsal pathway impairment in the autistic population are two studies revealing that autistic children are severely impaired in visually perceived environmental motion (Gepner, Mestre, Masson, & de Schonen, 1995;Gepner & Mestre, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These authors showed that autistic children exhibited higher thresholds in motion coherence perception (involving the dorsal pathway) than typically developing children, whereas these differences did not emerge for the formcoherence threshold (involving the ventral pathway). Also consistent with a dorsal pathway impairment in the autistic population are two studies revealing that autistic children are severely impaired in visually perceived environmental motion (Gepner, Mestre, Masson, & de Schonen, 1995;Gepner & Mestre, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Finally, elevated motion coherence thresholds in observers with highfunctioning autism (HFA), but not AS, have also been documented with Glass patterns (Glass, 1969), randomized dot arrays depicting correlated dot pairs (Spencer & O'Brien, 2006;Tsermentseli et al, 2008). In sum, the results of eight psychophysical studies (Davis et al, 2006;Gepner & Mestre, 2002;Gepner et al, 1995;Milne et al, 2002;Pellicano et al, 2005;Spencer & O'Brien, 2006;Spencer et al, 2000;Tsermentseli et al, 2008) converge in suggesting that the visual analysis of motion, whether in translating random dot patterns or expanding and contracting luminance gratings, is compromised in observers with ASD (Table 1). Because the perception of coherent motion in these random dot displays requires a global integration of motion information across many points, the threshold atypicalities described above may be consistent with a decreased reliance on global motion processes and/ or an increased reliance on local motion processes.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Visual Motion Processingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The first published report suggesting that observers with ASD show deficits in their visual perception of motion involved a study of children's postural reactions to optic flow (Gepner, Mestre, Masson, & de Schonen, 1995). Optic flow refers to the pattern of dynamic information that is projected onto the retinae whenever individuals move through their environment (Gibson, 1950).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Visual Motion Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormal response to visual motion was first reported by Gepner et al, who found that children with autism were less posturally reactive to motion information carried in optic flow than controls (Gepner & Mestre, 2002a, b;Gepner, Mestre, Masson, & De-Schonen, 1995). This result has been followed by additional data, which suggests that children with autism are impaired at recognizing biological motion (Blake, Turner, Smoski, Pozdol, & Stone, 2003) and in detecting coherent motion from noise (Milne et al, 2002;Spencer et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%